Google Search

Friday, September 20, 2013

Boston Cop Shoves Videographer, Then Threatens to Arrest Him for "Battery On A Police Officer"

Chris | InformationLiberation

Being assaulted by a police officer is grounds for being charged with battery on a police officer, at least according to this Boston police "Sargent" caught on video intimidating and threatening a man for videotaping.

From Carlos Miller:

A hefty plainclothes sergeant from the Boston Police Department figured the best way to not be exposed on camera was to physically confront a videographer, shoving him with his belly and pushing him back while threatening to arrest him for felony assault on an officer.

This, of course, is another common practice used by police, ranking right up there with ordering a non-resistant suspect to ?stop resisting? while physically pummeling him.

?You touch me again and I will lock you up for assault and battery on a police officer,? the burly sergeant told the burping videographer.

The sergeant and another plainclothes cop who identified himself as Fabiano told Jay Kelly that he needed to move out of the area because there was a police investigation.

Meanwhile, a shirtless jogger trots right through their investigation while numerous cars also drive through in opposite directions in two lanes.

The level of criminality one has to be comfortable with to boldly threaten to falsely charge someone with a crime while simultaneously committing a crime is almost incomprehensible, yet the cop clearly thinks nothing of it, knowing full well he is being videotaped.

Does anyone out there actually think this man was "served" by these police officers?

Would anyone out there voluntarily pay these men to protect them?

This is the problem with the compulsory monopoly that is the state, there is absolutely no accountability because there is no one to "watch the watchers." When the man asks to speak to the cop's supervisor, he says, "I am the supervisor." While the bald faced liar's word is completely worthless, we'll will know what his "supervisor" and his supervisor's supervisor thinks based on whether or not the cop is fired and charged with intimidation.
Chris runs the website, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.

(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); = id;js.src = "//";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Cop Convicted Of Second-Degree Manslaughter For Shooting 5-Yr-Old Boy In Back Of Head Gets Record Expunged, Now Free Again To Become An Officer
- Man Refuses To ID At Texas Border Patrol Checkpoint, Checkpoint Officer Says "Get The F*ck Out of Here" & Waves Him Through
- Attorneys For Ibragim Todashev's Father Say There's NO Evidence He Was Armed When FBI Executed Him
- Philly Cop Filmed Punching Small Woman In Face At Puerto Rican Day Parade Gets Job Back With Full Back Pay
- Oregon Deputies Caught on Dash Cam Acknowledging Illegal Traffic Stop
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- "They Kidnapped Our Child": Why CPS Needs Transparency Now
- Terrorist Group Seeks Military Tank In New Hampshire

Sargent: "What, you can't see my badge?"
he couldn't even see his badge. he barely found it under his tax-fed belly.

"Would anyone out there voluntarily pay these men to protect them?" -Chris

if takes only money, then, i'd prefer to pay police to sit on their asses at home.

videographer did a pretty good job.

the fat prick fabiano in the purple shirt has no right to invade your personal space, i teach this on day one of self-defense - don't even let a person get within your personal space if they're being aggressive because it allows you to be in too much danger, BARK orders at them to back the fuck off you will defend while placing hand on your weapon or if unarmed getting ready to strike or takedown.

fat prick in the purple - if me you'd have been SHOT, you aggressed on a peaceful person WHILE WEARING A GUN - NOT HAPPENING WITH ME PRICK, you'd be dead. ENFORCE THE ACTUAL LAW, YOU'RE NOT JUDGE DREDD.

@18443, actually, "actual law" would be physics and thermodynamics. you're a Christian, so, in your world, "actual law" is only 2 commandments + eight ways to create a serene life.

"statutory law," is not "actual." I can write-up a bunch of rules, trick people into believing in those rules, though, only your belief in them, can make them "actual."

for what reason, would the officer in the purple shirt, have to shoot you? you seem a bit off balance, like you're living the scenario in the video, on a daily basis... i don't like cops - would never be one, but, i wouldn't run about threatening an undercover. what if you threatened someone, who you thought was an undercover cop, but, they turned out not to be? "actual law" just might adhere, and, not to your benefit

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

View the original article here