Google Search

Showing posts with label Public. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Public. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

"Public Authority," Drone Murders, and the Death of the Rule of Law


by William Norman Grigg

In America, wrote Thomas Paine, ?the law is king.? In a totalitarian state, Vladimir Lenin wrote more than a century later, rulers exercise ?power without limit, resting directly on force, restrained by no laws.?

Lenin?s formula was a blunt expression of what is known as the ?public authority justification? for government action. That doctrine, as explained by one legal scholar, holds that ?Deeds which otherwise would be criminal, such as taking or destroying property, taking hold of a person by force and against his will ? or even taking his life, are not crimes if done with proper public authority.?

In other words, government can give itself permission to break the law. This claim is central to the recently-released 2010 Justice Department memorandum defending the Obama administration?s claim that the president can order the summary execution of US citizens through drone strikes. All that is necessary is for the president to designate a targeted citizen as an unlawful combatant. Once this is done, the extra-judicial murder is sanitized by the miracle of ?public authority,? thereby becoming a supposedly lawful exercise of war powers.

This is the doctrine the permitted Barack Obama to authorize the murder of a 16-year-old US citizen ? an act, and a claim, demonstrating that the rule of law is dead.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Video Shows Cop Assaulted Fox News Anchor, Lied About Arrest
- A SWAT Team Blew A Hole In My 2-Year-Old Son
- Woman Says DHS Forced Her to Strip Naked at Gunpoint During Terrifying Dawn Raid
- The Utter Uselessness of Police: Two Recent Examples from Idaho
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- Federal Court: Cops Cannot Push Drug Dog Into Open Car Door
- Cop Shot In Face Ambushing Resident In No-Knock Raid
- Sheriff John Urquhart Keeps the "Gang" Together

In fact, every law has an exception exactly for when the act is done with proper public authority. Without that, punishing for any law violations would be impossible. So it applies to the drone strike as well as to less exotic incarcerating a felon, which without this exception would be impossible as well. so there is an exception for child rape?

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

California City Achieves New Lows In Anti-Bullying Laws, Makes Public Entirely Subject To Other People's 'Feelings'


by Tim Cushing

Just stop.

"Fixing" bullying through rushed, stupid, reactionary laws does nothing to address the issue and generally just makes things worse. Carson, CA, Mayor Jim Dear thinks he's going to beat bullying and he's going to use a new law to do it. His plan is a real gem, though, requiring only a one-paragraph summary to encompass its utter vapidity. (via Adam Steinbaugh)

Under an ordinance that will go before the City Council next week, it would become a misdemeanor in the small Harbor-area city to cause anyone from kindergarten through age 25 to ?feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed or molested? with no legitimate purpose.
1. This wording suggests there are legitimate reasons to "terrorize, frighten, intimidate, threaten, harass or molest" people aged 5-25. Sadly, the mayor fails to provide examples.

2. Thicker skin is apparently grafted on at age 25, at which point people can expect to be terrorized, threatened, etc. right up to the limits of existing laws. The subtext here is that people are expected to "grow up" and deal with bullying better at some point in their lives. That arbitrary point appears to be four years past the legal drinking age.

3. This bill is entirely subjective -- the key word being "feel." No one is allowed to make anyone "feel" any of the above forbidden feelings. As presented here, there's no "reasonable person" subjectivity bar, which makes everyone in Carson subject to everyone else's feelings.

This bill also covers "cyberbullying," which is incredibly redundant considering all of the feelings listed above. But it goes beyond simple redundancy, offering additional actionable feelings specific to electronic communications.

It cites ?hurtful, rude and mean text messages? as a key form of cyberbullying, along with ?spreading rumors or lies about others by email or social networks.
"Hurtful?" "Rude?" "Mean?" Have you not met children, Mayor Dear? They can be all of these things without being bullies, simply because their sense of perspective has yet to mature. The most amazing things fall out of kids' mouths. Some grow brain-mouth filters as they mature. Others don't. But most start out without a knowledge of societal norms -- the unspoken agreement that specifies that you don't point out what's different or strange or funny about someone else to their face. But to Dear, these childish statements may be treated as misdemeanors.

For additional unintentional hilarity, here's a statement from the bill's co-sponsor.

Councilman Mike Gipson, a co-author of the measure, said the goal was to make Carson a ?bully-free city.?
Gipson's idealism would be admirable if it weren't completely indiscernible from the sort of thing politicians who have long since kissed their ideals goodbye would make. It's a promise that can't be kept, stated as a lofty goal towards which the city will e'er strive, even if it means criminalizing protected speech and non-criminal behavior. If this effort fails (and it will, at one level or another), the goalposts can always be moved, or the definitions changed, so that Carson, CA is constantly approaching the "bully-free" ideal.

The problem with unquantifiable goals is that someone will want to quantify it, if only to justify the arrest and booking of schoolchildren. And when you make certain activities the target, that will be what's counted. The more "bullies" it prosecutes, the closer it must be to achieving Gipson's and Dear's utopian goal. This provides twisted incentives for law enforcement and prosecutors, both of whom are now involved in a problem that used to be solved by parents and schools. Good work if you can get it -- especially if you've got a crusade on your mind -- but it's hardly a solution to a societal problem.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- Adult Photography Record-Keeping and Inspection Law Threatens Free Speech
- US Government Begins Rollout Of Its 'Driver's License For The Internet'
- State Dept Launches 'Free the Press' Campaign Same Day DOJ Asks Supreme Court To Jail Reporter
- Los Angeles Law Enforcement Looking To Crowdsource Surveillance
- TSA Ejects Mute, Disabled Woman From Flight Because She Couldn't Speak
- NSA Exploited Heartbleed for Own Use
- An NSA 'Reform Bill' of the Intelligence Community, Written by the Intelligence Community, and for the Intelligence Community
- Britain to Jail Parents Who Don't Love Their Children Enough

'Councilman Mike Gipson, a co-author of the measure, said the goal was to make Carson a ?bully-free city.?

What, he is moving somewhere else ?

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Monday, December 30, 2013

NYPD Orders "Immediate Surrender" Of Rifles, Even Though They Flaunt Them In Public Every Day



NEW YORK CITY, NY ? An order issued to a New York City resident to ?immediately surrender your rifle? is reminding the country once again how onerous the city?s gun control laws are and what a police state looks like.

Dated November 18th, 2013, the document from ?NYPD Rifle & Shotgun? cites that the unidentified resident possesses three .22 caliber rifles and must immediately surrender his property to the police or else provide notarized proof that they have been? removed from the city.

The document reads:

NYPD?s gun confiscation notice. (Truth About Guns)

Notice the absurd steps that the resident must take to prove his compliance.? Should he choose to not forfeit his property to the government, he must permanently remove it from the city and provide three forms of proof that it has been removed; a city report form, a notarized (!) statement of where the firearms will be kept, and even a utility bill or proof of residency detailing where the guns will be stored.

Obviously, privacy and property rights are heavily eroded for citizens of New York; which suffers from some of the most restrictive laws in the country.? Its difficult to imagine why citizens who appreciate their rights would continue to live there.? The document failed to mention a fourth option: flee from New York with your property and don?t look back.

The order cites? NYC Administrative Code 10-306 (b) as justification for violating the gun owner?s rights.? It reads:

b. No person may possess an ammunition feeding device which is designed for use in a rifle or shotgun and which is capable of holding more than five rounds of rifle or shotgun ammunition, unless such person is exempt from subdivision a of section 10-303.1 pursuant to section 10-305, provided that a dealer in rifles and shotguns may possess such ammunition feeding devices for the purpose of disposition authorized pursuant to subdivision a of this section.
The law is so restrictive that it is being used not only to confiscate guns with external magazines, but also guns with built-in tubes and internal feeding devices, as was the case for the rifles listed in this document.?? Tube-fed rifles are very slow and clumsy to reload.? Yet not even one of these common bolt-action 22LR rifles ? commonly used for hunting small varmints ? can pass muster for the control freaks in New York City.? The lack of legal options for self-defense leaves law-abiding citizens crippled and dependent upon the government for protection.

As you might have guessed, there are some exemptions to the law?

A New York City ESU agent. (Source: Tony Shi | Flickr)

Police officers are not only legally capable of carrying otherwise-banned firearms, they are purposely assigned to flaunt them conspicuously all over the city.? New York City is littered with rifle-toting agents, carrying all the ammunition capacity they can handle.

This is pointed out only to illustrate the hypocrisy of the the law and those who enforce it.? Like any police state, the elites have made themselves immune from the crippling restrictions that they are imposing on the taxpayers. The government affords itself with all of the best, modern tools that money can buy, while the rest of New Yorkers are left to wander through a web of cumbersome legal barriers and nonsensical restrictions.

A free society would not tolerate such legal disparities.?? All citizens ? with or without a badge ? should be left to maintain a full spectrum of individual rights.? The idea of a ?permitted? class of people with extra rights is offensive.

Since 2001, the laws in New York have only gotten more draconian, government intrusiveness has increased in every way, and the disparity between the legal abilities of cops and regular citizens has widened.

The current generation of New Yorkers is growing up immersed in statist culture, disarmed, constantly searched, and surrounded by paramilitary troopers.? A combination of ?Stop and Frisk? police tactics and pervasive checkpoints on the streets, subways, and airports makes people conditioned to being searched anytime for no reason.

Thus, New Yorkers often don?t even realize that there is a problem.? They may never have had the opportunity to? experience a freer society where their rights are not being infringed daily as a matter of policy.? The constant searches, legal double-standards, and masked rifle-toting sentries feels like the norm to them.

Such perversions of civil rights and dubious cultural conditioning have been key steps in making the New York police state a reality.
_
Police State USA is a volunteer, grassroots alternative media outlet dedicated to exposing the systemic formation of an American police state.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- "If We Have To Get A Warrant... We're Gonna Shoot & Kill Your Dogs... Ransack Your House"
- CPS Nabs Teenager Because She Was Hanging Out With Black People
- Pentagon Changes Drone Strike Rules To Permit Bombing Civilians
- Around Here, We Don't Call Internal Affairs
- Does Politeness Constitute Probable Cause?
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- Lawyer For Cop Charged In Beating Death Of Homeless Man Claims Officer Didn't Use ENOUGH Force
- The Sadistic Profligacy of Sheriff Joe Arpaio

why are they making robots?We already have to many on all sides.look at the picture .see the robot. All I see is another cop who " fears for his life " , hence all the hardware , we (Ireland) don't have an armed police force & get by just fine , they earn & get our respect for the work they do . When we NEED armed cops we have specially trained & licenced officers . NOT swat teams !
Also officers are not so willing to try using bullyboy tactics because they ain't packin heat :-) @irishpete, you can't reasonably "reason" with the commi's. government is in the process of "weeding out the weaklings" and noncompliant. (remember, their god wants sheep?)

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Washington Man Arrested for Video Recording SWAT Team from Public Sidewalk


by Carlos Miller

A Washington man was arrested for video recording police from a public sidewalk after they had raided his neighbor?s home Saturday.

He was charged with obstruction, although as you can see in the video below, all he was doing was interviewing his neighbor about having a gun pointed at her six-month-old daughter.

A militarized cop then walked up to him and told him he was not allowed to record him without his permission as you can see in the video above, which we all know is false ? especially considering the cop was the one who walked up to him (but that doesn?t even make a difference).

The man, who goes by 509rifas and lives in Yakima County, posted the videos and story and an open carry forum. Hopefully, we?ll get more details, including the police agency involved.

Here is his story:

So I heard a commotion outside, turns out SWAT was raiding my neighbors house again. Heard a flashbang then walked down to film it. I was there for a while, maybe 20 minutes with no problems.

Then I started talking to a young woman who asked me if I had it on camera when they pointed guns at her infant.

A sgt approached and told me not to film and whatnot, and I actually turned the camera off, turned it around to show him, and THEN he arrested me for obstruction.

He noticed my smaller camera and assumed it was on, and then arrested me. The arrest isn?t actually recorded, what let up to it up to the point I stopped recording is.

As they brought me over to the SWAT van he said something on the radio about ?grabbed this guy? recording? and I?m fairly certain I heard back ?stop him!.? I?ll find out for sure when I get the PRA records. But if that was what was said, that steps it up to another level.

As it stands right now, I am facing criminal charges of obstruction a law enforcement officer, and have court next week.

Carlos Miller runs the website Photography is Not a Crime

(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Cop Convicted Of Second-Degree Manslaughter For Shooting 5-Yr-Old Boy In Back Of Head Gets Record Expunged, Now Free Again To Become An Officer
- Boston Cop Shoves Videographer, Then Threatens to Arrest Him for "Battery On A Police Officer"
- Man Refuses To ID At Texas Border Patrol Checkpoint, Checkpoint Officer Says "Get The F*ck Out of Here" & Waves Him Through
- Attorneys For Ibragim Todashev's Father Say There's NO Evidence He Was Armed When FBI Executed Him
- Philly Cop Filmed Punching Small Woman In Face At Puerto Rican Day Parade Gets Job Back With Full Back Pay
- Oregon Deputies Caught on Dash Cam Acknowledging Illegal Traffic Stop
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- "They Kidnapped Our Child": Why CPS Needs Transparency Now

tell poncho from chips he can go fuck himself.

you don't have to be polite to someone who's a rude prick.

1 - he's in a public area, no person at all can claim you can't record, RECORD, continue, and resist false arrest by a cop VIOLATING THE LAW , fuck these law violators - if they aren't arrested for this then our system is of zero use - and it needs to be utterly ignored in entirety.

2 - he's a public servant working on our tax money, we can record his ugly face anytime we want. if he doesn't like the terms of employment he can quit, GIGANTIC PANTYWAIST that idiot is.

seriously - cuss these pricks out, then resist if they attack you.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Saturday, August 24, 2013

The Police State Mindset in Our Public Schools


By John W. Whitehead

Once upon a time in America, parents breathed a sigh of relief when their kids went back to school after a summer's hiatus, content in the knowledge that for a good portion of the day their kids would be gainfully occupied, out of harm's way and out of trouble. Those were the good old days, before school shootings became a part of our national lexicon and schools, aiming for greater security, transformed themselves into quasi-prisons, complete with surveillance cameras, metal detectors, police patrols, zero tolerance policies, lock downs, drug sniffing dogs and strip searches.

Unfortunately, somewhere along the way, instead of making the schools safer, we simply managed to make them more authoritarian. It used to be that if you talked back to a teacher, or played a prank on a classmate, or just failed to do your homework, you might find yourself in detention or doing an extra writing assignment after school. Nowadays, students are not only punished for transgressions more minor than those--such as playing cops and robbers on the playground, bringing LEGOs to school, or having a food fight--but they are punished with suspension, expulsion, and even arrest.

As a result, America is now on a fast track to raising up an Orwellian generation--one populated by compliant citizens accustomed to living in a police state and who march in lockstep to the dictates of the government. Indeed, as I point out in my book,?A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, with every school police raid and overzealous punishment that is carried out in the name of school safety, the lesson being imparted is that Americans--especially young people--have no rights at all against the state or the police. In fact, the majority of schools today have adopted an all-or-nothing lockdown mindset that leaves little room for freedom, individuality or due process.

For example, when high school senior Ashley Smithwick grabbed the wrong lunch sack--her father's--on the way to school, the star soccer player had no idea that her mistake would land her in a sea of legal troubles. Unbeknownst to Ashley, the lunchbox contained her father's paring knife, a 2-inch blade he uses to cut his apple during lunch. It was only when a school official searching through students' belongings found the diminutive knife, which administrators considered a "weapon," that Ashley realized what had happened and explained the mistake. Nevertheless, school officials referred Ashley to the police, who in turn charged her with a Class 1 misdemeanor for possessing a "sharp-pointed or edged instrument on educational property."

Tieshka Avery, a diabetic teenager living in Birmingham, Alabama, was slammed into a filing cabinet and arrested after falling asleep during an in-school suspension. The young lady, who suffers from sleep apnea and asthma, had fallen asleep while reading?Huckleberry Finn?in detention. After a school official threw a book at her, Avery went to the hall to collect herself. While speaking on the phone with her mother, she was approached from behind by a police officer, who slammed her into a filing cabinet and arrested her. Avery is currently pursuing a lawsuit against the school.

Unfortunately, while these may appear to be isolated incidents, they are indicative of a nationwide phenomenon in which children are treated like criminals, especially within the public schools. The ramifications are far-reaching. As Emily Bloomenthal, writing for the?New York University Review of Law & Social Change, explains:

Studies have found that youth who have been suspended are at increased risk of being required to repeat a grade, and suspensions are a strong predictor of later school dropout. Researchers have concluded that "suspension often becomes a 'pushout' tool to encourage low-achieving students and those viewed as 'troublemakers' to leave school before graduation." Students who have been suspended are also more likely to commit a crime and/or to end up incarcerated as an adult, a pattern that has been dubbed the "school-to-prison pipeline."
Moreover, as suspensions and arrests for minor failings and childish behavior become increasingly common, so does the spread of mass surveillance in our nation's schools. In fact, our schools have become a microcosm of the total surveillance state which currently dominates America, adopting a host of surveillance technologies, including video cameras, finger and palm scanners, iris scanners, as well as RFID and GPS tracking devices, to keep constant watch over their student bodies.

For example, in May 2013, Polk County School District in Florida foisted an iris scanning program on its students without parental consent. Parents were sent a letter explaining they could opt their children out of the program, but by the time the letter had reached parents, 750 children had already had their eyes scanned and their biometric data collected.

Making matters worse, these iris scanning programs are gaining traction in the schools, with school buses even getting in on the action. As students enter the school bus, they will be told to look through a pair of binocular-like scanners which will either blink, indicating that the student is on the right bus, or honk, indicating that they've chosen the wrong one. This technology is linked with a mobile app which parents can use to track their child's exact whereabouts, as each time their eyes are scanned the parent receives a print out with their photo and Google map location, along with a timestamp. Benefits aside, the potential for abuse, especially in the hands of those who prey on the young, are limitless.

It has been said that America's schools are the training ground for future generations. If so, and unless we can do something to rein in this runaway train, this next generation will be the most compliant, fearful and oppressed generation ever to come of age in America, and they will be marching in lockstep with the police state._
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead [send him mail] is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. He is the author of A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State and The Change Manifesto (Sourcebooks).


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Cop Convicted Of Second-Degree Manslaughter For Shooting 5-Yr-Old Boy In Back Of Head Gets Record Expunged, Now Free Again To Become An Officer
- Boston Cop Shoves Videographer, Then Threatens to Arrest Him for "Battery On A Police Officer"
- Man Refuses To ID At Texas Border Patrol Checkpoint, Checkpoint Officer Says "Get The F*ck Out of Here" & Waves Him Through
- Attorneys For Ibragim Todashev's Father Say There's NO Evidence He Was Armed When FBI Executed Him
- Philly Cop Filmed Punching Small Woman In Face At Puerto Rican Day Parade Gets Job Back With Full Back Pay
- Oregon Deputies Caught on Dash Cam Acknowledging Illegal Traffic Stop
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- "They Kidnapped Our Child": Why CPS Needs Transparency Now

These reasons are precisely why I will not be sending my young'en to the government schools. Hopefully it will still be legal to home school him when the time comes or the guber-ment does not dip their slimy mits into the private schools curriculum. Also, parents beware....COMMON CORE IS COMING!

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Troubling Public Opinion Trends for Gun Rights and Civil Liberties


Follow @infolibnews!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src='//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,'script','twitter-wjs'); By Anthony Gregory

On how to respond to mass shootings and violent crime, the public opinion trends frighten me, especially when broken down by political identification. Predictably, Democrats are in favor of gun control by wider margins than Republicans. But still, 92% of Republicans favor universal background checks, which I consider as bad a proposal as any being offered. It will mean the death of gun shows as we know them. The relative freedom with which Americans private trade firearms is one of the greatest spheres of liberty in the country, something that sets the United States apart from most places. Ninety-one percent of the population want to abolish the freedom (independents being slightly more reluctant than either Democrats or Republicans to support such a measure). This would be the most significant strike against gun rights, and one of the most important violations of the Bill of Rights in general, in modern times.

One theme I try to focus on in these discussions is how gun control is merely one of many core elements of the police state, and that those who oppose criminal justice and police abuses should be more skeptical of gun laws, and those who favor the right to bear arms should be much more skeptical of militarized policing, prosecutorial shenanigans, the prison system, the drug war, and so many other heavy-handed government measures that contribute to violent crime and boost the rationale for gun control. It never made sense to me that those who favor gun control would decry racism in the courtroom and those who see gun rights as a bulwark against tyranny would deny the pervasiveness of police brutality.

Well, for once, at least these poll results enjoy some internal consistency. 63% of Republicans want to see 15,000 more police on the streets. Not to be outdone, 81% of Democrats back the same proposal.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Commentary
- I Put My Life On The Line Writing This Article!
- Government Undermines Social Cooperation
- It's Not Evil to Copy
- "Conspiracy Theory": Foundations of a Weaponized Term
- Government Will Lose the War on Piracy
- John Mackey's Political Correctness
- John Taylor Gatto on the Inanity of Gun Control
- "Gun Control for the Children?" Sorry, No Sale.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Friday, August 31, 2012

Senate Anti-Leaks Bill Threatens the Rights of the Press and the Public



BY JENNIFER LYNCH AND TREVOR TIMM

The US Senate is currently debating a dangerous bill that, if passed, would have broad consequences for press freedom and the public's right to know. EFF asks senators to stand up for government transparency and the First Amendment and vote it down.

The bill's provisions, buried in the annual Intelligence Authorization Act, are intended to stop leaks of classified information to reporters--a premise worrying in itself--but it is written so sloppily it will also severely impair government transparency and prevent the media from reporting on national security issues.

The problems with this bill are extensive and severe. As the New York Times pointed out in an unusually forceful editorial last Friday, it has been "drafted in secret without public hearings" and bars most government employees from giving press background briefings, even if the information is unclassified--vital for media organizations when reporting on complex issues. Another provision prohibits officials from writing op-eds or appearing on television, again, even if the information is unclassified--a clear prohibition on protected speech.

Classification expert Steven Aftergood documented several specific problems with the bill's broad definitions, most notably that the bill doesn't differentiate between properly and improperly classified information. Even the Freedom of Information Act, which carries a broad exception for classified information. insists it must be "properly classified."

This is especially troubling given that the government's secrecy system has ballooned to absurd proportions, to the point where virtually every government action in the national security or foreign policy realm has been stamped classified, many times improperly. Information is regularly classified to hide embarrassing details, government waste, corruption, and even serious constitutional violations. The former head of the U.S. classification process, J. William Leonard, recently called the system "dysfunctional" because it "clearly lacks the ability to differentiate between trivial information and that which can truly damage our nation's well-being." The bill's definition is virtually an invitation for government officials to further use secrecy to hide their conduct.

And if classification were used to hide such wrongdoing, "there is no exception carved out for whistle-blowers or other news media contacts that advance the public's awareness," as the New York Times reported. At the same time, Congress, its staff, and other high level officials are exempt from many of the bill's provisions.

The Obama administration has already been far too aggressive in prosecuting whistleblowers--its charged more leakers than all other administrations combined--and the latest, wide ranging FBI investigation into new leaks is "casting a distinct chill over press coverage of national security issues as agencies decline routine interview requests and refuse to provide background briefings" as the New York Times reported on its front page last Thursday. The new anti-leaks bill has the potential to permanently alter the way news media can interact with government officials. ??As the New York Times editorial board said in its criticism Friday, this won't just chill the press, but potentially "undermine democracy by denying Americans access to information essential to national debate on critical issues like the extent of government spying powers and the use of torture."

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this bill is the fact that it has been proposed at all. As Steven Aftergood notes, "there is something incongruous, if not outrageous, about the whole effort by Congress to induce stricter secrecy in the executive branch, which already has every institutional incentive to restrict public disclosure of intelligence information." Aftergood reminds us that, in the past, leaks led to investigations into the programs exposed and to "substantive" Congressional oversight. In stark contrast, the response to leaks in the years since September 11, 2001--by both Congress and the Executive--has been to prosecue whisteblowers--and even reporters--and to ensure even more information is kept secret from the American public.

Take, for example, the national debate on the use of classified drone strikes in overseas military operations.? As the New Yorker's Steve Coll wrote, the new book by Newsweek reporter Daniel Klaidman on President Obama's use of classified drone strikes discusses "the first instance in American history of a sitting President speaking of his intent to kill a particular U.S. citizen without that citizen having been charged formally with a crime or convicted at trial." Similarly, when the New York Times reported on U.S. cyberattacks against Iran--another target of recent leak investigations--the Times said the decision to engage in offensive cyberattacks was so consequential and unprecedented, that it is comparable to "the first use of atomic weapons in the 1940s."?

These are just two instances of decisions by the President which -- whether you agree with them or not-- should be debated and scrutinized in both the halls of Congress and the public sphere. Yet because they are hidden behind giant walls of secrecy, there is no oversight or accountability, and the public has no say in decision as to whether the country should be engaging in them at all.

Late Friday, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Dianne Feinstein said the committee would "reconsider" some of the proposals after receiving a firestorm of criticism last week. She should go farther and strike them entirely--they have no place in a democracy that values government transparency and prides itself on press freedom and justice under the law.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- Leaked: Stratfor Emails Reveal Secret, Widespread 'TrapWire' Surveillance System
- FBI: Constitution Stands In Way of Government Thwarting "Extremist"? Groups
- FBI Monitored Dotcom Raid Via Live Video Link, Secret Govt Group Involved
- Google Starts Punishing "Pirate" Sites In Search Results
- Court: Feds Can Spy On Americans Without Warrants With No Legal Repurcussions
- Demonoid Busted As A Gift To The United States Government
- FBI's Facial Recognition is Coming to a State Near You
- Did You Know That Professional Writing Is Dying And Only Taxing The Public To Pay Writers Can Save It

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Swear in Public? That'll Cost You $20, Payable to the State



Chris | InformationLiberation

Anyone who thinks democracy is a proper system of government need look no further.

Citizens in the Massachusets town of Middleborough voted to impose a $20 fine on their fellow subjects for committing the newly created "crime" of swearing.

Via AP:

MIDDLEBOROUGH, Mass. (AP) ? Residents in Middleborough voted Monday night to make the foul-mouthed pay fines for swearing in public.

At a town meeting, residents voted 183-50 to approve a proposal from the police chief to impose a $20 fine on public profanity.

Officials insist the proposal was not intended to censor casual or private conversations, but instead to crack down on loud, profanity-laden language used by teens and other young people in the downtown area and public parks.

"I'm really happy about it," Mimi Duphily, a store owner and former town selectwoman, said after the vote. "I'm sure there's going to be some fallout, but I think what we did was necessary."

Statist logic: To swear in public is horrible and profane, to impose a tax on someone for swearing in public and threaten to jail them for not paying said tax is A-OK.

UPDATE: Adam Kokesh is organizing a "Free F**KING Speech Demonstration In Middleborough, MA!" Check it out on Facebook!


Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Allegation: Utah Police Wrote Phony Tickets To Tourists, Pocketed The Cash
- Gardening in the twenty first century [Comic]
- Police Arrest Woman For Filming Them, Take Phone Out Of Her Bra, Claim That It Must Be Kept As 'Evidence'
- In Russia Police Obeys You
- Cellphone Video Shows Four Cops Beating Philly Motorist Charged with Aggravated Assault and Resisting Arrest
- The Nature of Bureaucracy is to Grow - Doug Casey
- Fatal Police Shootings Up 70 Percent in Los Angeles County
- 'Click It Or Ticket' Now Applies To Your Cats & Dogs, NJ Residents Face $1,000 Tickets If Pets Not Locked In Harness


People are voting to take away their own rights.

Humans, the most stupid creature on the planet.

Middleborough is a town in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, United States. The population was 23,116 as of the 2010 census.

Notable residents:

Count Primo Magri, a dwarf celebrity with P. T. Barnum

General Tom Thumb, stage name of Charles Sherwood Stratton, dwarf celebrity with P. T. Barnum

Lavinia Warren, dwarf with P.T. Barnum who married Gen. Tom Thumb and later Count Primo Magri

Minnie Warren, dwarf with P.T. Barnum

Rick Fuller, professional wrestler

hey cops and those in support fuck you!

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Sending Your Kids to Public School Is Child Abuse

by Jeff Berwick

I don't know why it was so obvious to me. School was prison for kids. That's the way I saw it. But as I looked at my fellow school inmates around me they didn't seem to notice.

By the time I reached high school I had resigned myself to just getting a passing grade to make my parents happy and move on. My goal: 50%. I didn't want 51%... if I got that, I was trying too hard. I'd rarely show up. And when I did I'd sit in the back row listening to the horse race reports from the warmup sessions at the track where I would go each evening and, in nearly 100 visits, perhaps recorded a loss at the end of each evening once or twice.

As for school, I'd really only go for the tests. I'd go two hours early and speed read the textbook and make sure I knew just enough to pass. I was quite good at it, to the point where on my final exam of high school I had planned it perfectly so passing the course would give me just enough to graduate and I even knew the exact score I needed on the test to pass: 62%.

It was social studies, which I detested for having to memorize obvious propaganda, but it was easy enough to pass the exam. I'd short-term memorize as much as I could and the dates and places that I couldn't remember I'd write on my forearm, or my leg, or on any number of cheat sheets I had. It was a two hour exam and there were multiple choice questions worth 70% and essays worth 30%. I went through the multiple choice in about 30 minutes and knew I had enough to get 62% so I didn't even bother with the essay section. I got up to leave and was informed that there was a "minimum time requirement of 1 hour".

"A minimum time requirement," I complained! "But, I'm done!"

"Go sit until the hour is up," they admonished. Servitude to unworthy authoritarian figures is the real goal of schooling in the west. Angry, and bored for the next 30 minutes, I went on to write some of the more disturbing and outright erroneous essay answer questions probably ever recorded in social studies history.

But, finally the hour was up and I could escape. And I did pass that course and finally was allowed out of child prison.

THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW

Even back in the 1980s school was atrocious. But when I look at what is going on today I can only come to one conclusion: sending your child to public school in the US is child abuse.

Think I'm exagerrating? Hear me out.

Let's just start with all the injections your child will receive if you force them to go for their government training. The fascist US Government which is one in the same with the pharmaceutical industry continues to want to inject more and more heinous chemicals into your children while they have them under their "care".

In one instance, a 14-year-old girl was forced to take vaccinations for hepatitis A, seasonal influenza, meningitis, and HPV (Gardasil) in a Detroit area school despite her parents previously-stated opposition to their daughter receiving medical treatments from the school (see story here).

This is just standard operating procedure at most school's nowadays. "Parents give up their rights when they drop the children off at public school," said Melinda Harmon, a US Federal Judge, recently.

Giving multiple vaccines is "like a sudden onslaught to the body's immune system", according to this Australian Government study. And, when given to youngsters whose immune system hasn't yet fully formed, it can be catastrophic for health... which is probably the point. Remember, people like Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Al Gore and more are trying to do as much as possible to reduce the global population. Bill Gates has even stated publicly that vaccines are one of the best way to do this.

Now, in a new amendment to California's Health and Safety Code as it relates to vaccinations will take effect this fall for the 2012-2013 school year, and will require all incoming seventh graders, as well as eighth and twelfth graders for the first year, to get a Tdap booster vaccination for pertussis (whooping cough) before being admitted to school. Mandatory.

"A number of clinical laboratory studies demonstrate that vaccines may cause chronic damage to the G.I. tract, immune system, brain, and other organs," says Bernard Rimland, Ph.D., an American research psychologist, writer, lecturer and advocate for autistic children.

And, once your child has had their immune system attacked by countless unnecessary and dangerous vaccines (autism has increased 1000% since 1990 due to vaccines) then the government will be looking to give them all manner of other chemicals.

Your child has a little too much energy and doesn't want to sit and listen to complete morons trying to brainwash them with garbage? They'll be sent home with a prescription for the highly addictive and dangerous chemical, adderall.

PRISON ENVIRONMENT

When they aren't being dumbed down by drugs or having their immune system destroyed by vaccines they have to actually deal with their Lord of the Flies type environment.

Many parents actually are aware of this environment and will support it stating it is good... it will toughen them up, they say. We're not so sure sending your five, ten or fifteen year old into something that is not that different than a high security prison to avoid getting shivved in the bathroom is the best way to teach them about life. You could just rent Oz for them and save them some terrible emotional scars.

TDV subscriber and correspondent, David Giessel, sent us these photos of a maximum security prison in Oakland recently:

And this:

Well, maximum security child prison. That's an elementary school in Oakland. Your kids will have such warm memories of their time interned, no doubt!

And, if you try to get out, microchips implanted in your child's school uniform will notify the authorities, if this technique used in Brazil catches on... and it is sure to.

And that is when the state isn't trying to trap your kids into victimless crimes to bust them. A 22 year old cop in Exiter California wasted eight months of stolen taxpayer money trying to trap little kids into buying something, anything which would take away the pain of 12 years of being imprisoned in their formative years. Nearly a year later he had ruined the lives of twelve high school prisoners and all but ensured their graduation to adult prison... or as they call it, prison.

The cop was almost giddy as he stated, "A lot of jaws dropped when they saw me. They knew me as that kid at school that they hung around with, and then the next thing they're in handcuffs and I'm in a uniform."

And when they aren't being beaten up or entrapped into prison sentences by the state, they are being prepared for their future FEMA camp internment.

According to "The End Of The American Dream":

All over the United States, school children are being taken out of their classrooms, put on buses and sent to "alternate locations" during terror drills. These exercises are often called "evacuation drills" or "relocation drills" and they are more than a little disturbing. Sometimes parents are notified in advance where the kids are being taken and sometimes they are only told that the children are being taken to an "undisclosed location". In the years since 9/11 and the Columbine school shootings, there has been a concerted effort to make school emergency drills much more "realistic" and much more intense. Unfortunately, the fact that many of these drills are deeply traumatizing many children does not seem to bother too many people. Do we really need to have "active shooter" drills where men point guns at our kids and fire blanks at them? Do we really need to have "relocation drills" where kids are rapidly herded on to buses and told that they must surrender their cell phones because they will not be allowed to call anyone? Our schools more closely resemble prison camps every single day, and it is our children that are suffering because of it.

Or, like at an elementary school in Baltimore recently, three nine-year-old girls and an eight-year-old boy were arrested for fighting and marched out of their elementary school in handcuffs. In New Haven, Connecticut a 10-year-old boy was actually arrested by police for giving another student "a wedgie" on a school bus. Or, in San Mateo, California a few months ago a 7-year-old special education student was blasted in the face with pepper spray because he would not quit climbing on the furniture. Police were then able to subdue the boy and he was "committed for a psychiatric evaluation".

And, when they aren't being arrested or handcuffed, the school will be working to ensure your child adheres to the will of the collective and does not try to be an individual and use their own mind independently as this teacher's letter reinforces:

CHILD ABUSE

You can state that you have been the victim of theft and are forced to pay for these schools. And, yes, you are. But nothing can justify actually sending your children off everyday to this type of environment. If you do, you are a child abuser. Especially when homeschooling and unschooling have been made so eminently possible thanks to the internet.

You can then state that thanks to the socialist/fascist government and the central banks you've been so impoverished that you and your wife must work 18-hour days just to survive... and that is why you send your kids to prison camp. But, even that is not justification enough to do this to your own children. If this is the case and you cannot find any other way then leave where you live and search for a place with better opportunities.

It's hard. I know. It was hard for your ancestors to get on that boat and survive scurvy and come to a foreign land to make a living too. But they did it.

Here, at TDV, we are working on all manner of ways to help people in that situation. We are helping people get out of the western world through foreign residencies and second passports (TDVPassports.com)... and the TDV newsletter regularly covers all these subjects.

The latest thing we are working on is a liberty-minded enclave, likely in Mexico to start (and then other locations through Asia, Africa and Central/South America afterwards) which will be built in co-housing style. Our top priority will be self-sufficiency and a true community environment where the occupants live, work and co-operate with each other to build a prosperous community. And the other main factor is price. We want to make it as cheap as possible to attract young, freedom-minded families. We are talking under $50,000 for a complete family unit and total daily living costs of under $5, using economies of scale to efficiently provide organic food and homeschooling/unschooling opportunities for all. Not anarcho-communism... that is seriously stupid. But a community of anarchists who believe in property rights and the non-aggression principle.

This is the type of thing we are working on here at TDV. Stay tuned for more. In the meantime, don't be a fool, get your child out of school.
__
Jeff Berwick [send him mail] is an anarcho-capitalist freedom fighter and Chief Editor of the libertarian, Austrian economics grounded newsletter, The Dollar Vigilante. The Dollar Vigilante focuses on strategies, investments and expatriation opportunities to survive & prosper during and after the US dollar collapse.


View the original article here

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Federal plan to mandate handicapped access for all public pools temporarily delayed


The Justice Department on Thursday issued a 60-day stay of execution for hundreds of thousands of public pools which had been required to install ramps and wheelchair lifts by today or else face lawsuits over violating disability laws.

President Obama in 2010 dramatically expanded the rules for access under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the new regulations mean that every publicly accessible pool ? from municipal facilities to hotels ? must have two "accessible means of entry," at least one of which must be a ramp or wheelchair lift. Spas must also have either a lift or a transfer system to help the disabled enter them, under the new rules.

Under the law, non-compliant facilities can be sued ? and some lawmakers feared a bonanza for lawyers eager to capitalize.

Read More


Latest Economy
- The Mighty Return of Lard
- 'This American Life' Retracts Mike Daisey's Piece On Foxconn For "Significant Fabrications"
- Money Laundering
- Peter Schiff Rips Bernanke at The Atlantic Economy Summit
- Peter Schiff vs Paul Volcker
- Prison Nation Going Broke
- Stress Tests No Sweat
- It's Official - Apple Is Now Bigger Than The Entire US Retail Sector

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Bernanke Public Approval Falls to Lowest With Too-Slow Economy

By Joshua Zumbrun

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke?s standing with the public has slid to its lowest level in almost two years of polling on the issue, even as faith in the Federal Reserve holds up.

Bernanke is viewed favorably by 30 percent of those polled, compared with 26 percent who view him unfavorably; the remainder are unsure. In September of 2009, Bernanke enjoyed 41 percent approval and 22 percent disapproval. The Fed itself is viewed favorably by 42 percent of voters, little changed from previous surveys.

The Bloomberg National Poll, conducted June 17-20, shows that the reputation of Bernanke, who led the central bank through the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, has slid lower as the unemployment rate has remained stuck near 9 percent or higher for 26 consecutive months.

Read More


Latest Economy
- Marc Faber on 21st Century Investing, Why It's Too Late for the Dollar and Why Emerging Markets Look Good
- Peter Schiff: The Lies a Fed Chairman Tells
- Bernanke Leaves Door Open to Further Easing
- 70% Say Default is Bad for Economy, 56% Say Failure to Cut Spending is Worse
- Another Bitcoin Crash
- John Stossel - The Licensing Racket
- This is $750K of government supplies going in the trash due to expiration. We buy it, hold it until it expires, and throw it away. This is a monthly routine.
- End Game

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Raw Milk: Public Enemy #1

by Karen De Coster, LRC Blog

Ban the unhealthy. Except who decides what is "unhealthy" for you, me, or anyone? Why, the government and its assorted cadre of experts who are source of truth for what is or isn't "healthy." Here's a scientist who is an editor for?RealClearScience in an?article he published for CNN:

Consuming a diet loaded with fat and salt is unhealthy, but the government has no business regulating that. Raw milk, however, is different. Unpasteurized milk has a greater chance of being contaminated with disease-causing bacteria than pasteurized milk.
If that's real clear science, then I am one unclear rube. I like how the classic, timeworn line "fat and salt are unhealthy" is squeezed in to launch the sentence and set the tone. No, consuming a diet of healthy animal fats is what is missing in the SAD (Standard American Diet). People are fat and sick on processed foods, carbohydrates, and liquid sugar, which they consume -- along with a flood of pharmaceuticals -- to replace the animal fats they are no longer eating.

That said, the author calls for a ban on raw milk, a wholesome, healthy product that has become public enemy #1. The title of his piece is, "The Other E. Coli threat? Raw milk." It amuses me to see just how much the megalomaniacs stomp and scream in their efforts to stamp out consumer choice and raw milk in the name of "science." As?Auberon Herbert stated, "By what right do men exercise power over each other?"?But, at least the author stops short of calling for a ban on fat and salt. In that case, the USDA would be raiding my basement and carrying out my stash of grass-fed/pastured meats and celtic sea salt as illicit goods.


Latest Commentary
- War on Terror Is Bad for Economy
- 9/11 and the Orwellian Redefinition of "Conspiracy Theory"
- The War on Immigrants, Farmers, and Consumers
- When the State Breaks a Man
- New York Times Columnist Nicholas Kristof: The Military as Socialist Model for America
- From Farm to Zoning Official
- The Persecution of Juan Cole
- Imperial Inanity

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

The Kind of "Public Service" We Can Do Without

by David S. D'Amato

In a column for the Huffington Post on Monday, June 13, 2011, Columbia University's Steven Cohen asserts that "every American should be frightened by the profound and intensifying attack on government and public service." Cohen submits a vision of the United States very close to an antithesis of the one that actually exists, his alternative universe being a place where the state has been trivialized in favor of "the free market."

Cohen's utopia would apparently be a place where the government and giant corporations work hand in glove, their alliance driven by a vaguely parental "passion for public service." His major assumptions, then, are twofold: That public services cannot be provided but through hierarchy and violent monopolization, and that violent monopolists have every interest in serving the public. Well, on both counts, Cohen couldn't be more wrong.

He writes that "[c]apitalists are starting to understand that mass poverty and unemployment is politically destabilizing," but they have always understood this. Because the economic system of Big Business and Big Government has been so deftly efficient at bleeding working people dry, the ruling class has found it expedient to assemble a welfare framework.

Their bureaucracy for "public assistance," though, whatever its appearance, is grounded not in the humanity or benevolence of the elite, but in their shrewd calculations. As in Tolstoy's famous parable, the farmers are eventually "afraid that the cows may cease to yield milk," and so "they invent various means of improving the condition of these cows."

For the total state's "helping professions," public service consists in condescendingly rounding up and corralling those that need to be "helped," so that their lives can be strictly regimented and overseen. The absolute best thing that the state could do for the poor -- the one thing that would truly change their posture on a fundamental level -- is the one that is never broached in "respectable," mainstream debate. Under no circumstances is it considered that we might, returning to Tolstoy's allegorical farm, "take down the fence and grant the cows their natural freedom."

As a practical matter, the "proper balance" between commercial interests on the one hand and the state on the other has been no balance at all. Whereas "balance" implies a trade-off between two poles or sides of a scale, the interests of state and corporate power are one and the same. Indeed, to suggest even that they can be differentiated in the prevailing economic system is absurd, ignoring the pervasive coercion that runs through it at every level.

Cohen's version of "public service" is no more than a mantra invoked to glorify the sweeping, anti-competitive affronts against a true free market that the state institutes to profit the rich. The state-corporate projects Cohen fawningly praises are the sorts of things that require eminent domain land-grabs for new Pfizer complexes; his darling infrastructure investments are the ruin of the spontaneous order of a market freed from state intervention -- the kind of market that could open doors for America's least fortunate.

Quite contrary to the fretful contentions of the Earth Institute's Executive Director, neither an "attack on public service" nor even a faint disapproval of its underlying values is prevailing in Washington. The public-private collusion Cohen is so enamored of, rather than retrenching, has left room for "the free market" of his nightmares only at the narrowest margins of economic life. Market anarchism would restore peaceful trade and association to its proper place within society, turning social services over to the forces inherent in genuine community.

Having confused American state capitalism with the free market, Cohen accepts (completely uncritically) the asinine folk tale that, in our current economy, there is some kind of bright line dividing "the private and the public sectors." He doesn't seem to notice that, far from advocating anything remotely close to a true free market, the "capitalists" he refers to have persistently been at the forefront of calls for "the mix of public and private roles."

Cohen's program of faux "public service" has won the day -- has allowed huge, bureaucratic corporations and government agencies to crowd out or completely preclude competitors and to dominate our lives. Instead of cheerleading for more of the same, genuine public service would mean unshackling voluntary cooperation and exchange, allowing communities themselves to decide how to help themselves.

Market anarchists contend that absent state monopolization -- and its real-world effect of creating scarcities to enrich the well-connected -- everything from utilities to aid for the poor would witness vast improvements. While Cohen would aggrandize the authoritarian institutions that have decimated the economy, market anarchists would empower individuals to work together to solve, rather than create, society's problems.
__
C4SS News Analyst David S. D'Amato is a market anarchist and a lawyer with an LL.M. in International Law and Business. His aversion to superstition and all permutations of political authority manifests itself at www.firsttruths.com.


Latest Commentary
- War on Terror Is Bad for Economy
- 9/11 and the Orwellian Redefinition of "Conspiracy Theory"
- The War on Immigrants, Farmers, and Consumers
- When the State Breaks a Man
- New York Times Columnist Nicholas Kristof: The Military as Socialist Model for America
- From Farm to Zoning Official
- The Persecution of Juan Cole
- Imperial Inanity

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here