Google Search

Showing posts with label killed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label killed. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Multiple Eyewitnesses Claim Unarmed Wichita Man had Hands Up Prior to Being Killed by Cops


By Jay Syrmopoulos

Wichita, Kansas ? Witnesses in the shooting death of unarmed 23-year-old John Paul Quintero have come forward to refute police statements regarding the shooting death of Quintero.

The incident, which took place on Saturday night, began when Quintero's family called 911, saying Quintero was under the influence of alcohol and had threatened them with a knife at a party.

According to police, Quintero was "belligerent" and wouldn't comply with the two officers who arrived at the scene eight minutes later, while seated in an SUV with his father, parked in front of the house.

Ted McAdams and his wife live in the unit behind where the party was going on. They ran outside after they heard screaming. McAdams claims to have witnessed the tragic events leading up to the death of Quintero.

According to McAdams, Quintero was "trying to talk to the male officer with compliance" and "had his arms up until he got tasered, [when] his arms went down to his side."
Multiple witnesses have stated that Quintero had his hands up and seemed to be compliant, until another officer employed a taser on him, subsequently causing Quintero to lower his hands, which then lead to Martin shooting him in the chest with an AR-15, according to KAKE.com.

Police claim Quintero reached toward an officer?s waistband, but McAdams refutes that statement, claiming that he saw the incident and never saw Quintero make such a move.

It must be noted, that claiming a person reached for an officer?s waistband/weapon, is one of the standard police refrains when attempting to justify use of deadly force in the killing unarmed citizens.

A former state school board member from Wichita and vice chairman of the city's Racial Profiling Advisory Board, Walt Chappell, told the Wichita Eagle he had a feeling the officers "made a conscious decision to escalate rather than de-escalate."

The mere fact that the female officer walked up with a rifle "would indicate to me they were already loaded for bear," Chappell said.

McAdams says he?s not alone in thinking this situation was taken too far.

?After that all the neighbors and I threw a little fit at the cops because I?ve got a wife and a newborn and the safety issue and not just that, the way the cops handled themselves.?

He added, ?If he was told to do something, yeah he should?ve done it, but that officer had, to my advice and my suggestion, she shouldn?t have ever shot him.?

Another witness, Dustin Deckard, was driving home on Saturday afternoon when he witnessed a cop aiming her rifle at an unarmed man with his hands up.

"It was clearly a younger man in his early 20s of Hispanic descent, and he was wearing a blue jersey and he had his hands up," said Deckard, referring to the Wichita Police.

"He was behind the SUV, and the female officer was mostly directly in front of him, a little bit to his left. Both the officers were on either side of him, but he was facing the female officer who had her rifle up, and she was looking down the sight."

Deckard added, "It was very eerie, because the shooting must have occurred seconds after. When I passed, I slowed down, so I only got a couple seconds of a view."

Chappell made a very clear point when he stated,
"You don't go in ready to shoot first and ask questions later. There's a lot of things you can do before you ever pull out a weapon.?
The militarized, us vs. them, mindset of US cops, which escalate already tense situations into outright violent altercations, is a plague upon law enforcement and the public that they claim to serve.

Here is audio of the initial 9-1-1 call by the family. All they wanted was help in stopping a fight, instead, a young man was gunned down.


_
Jay Syrmopoulos is an investigative journalist, freethinker, researcher, and ardent opponent of authoritarianism. He is currently a graduate student at University of Denver pursuing a masters in Global Affairs. Jay?s work has previously been published on BenSwann.com and WeAreChange.org. You can follow him on Twitter @sirmetropolis, on Facebook at Sir Metropolis and now on tsu.


(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.0"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- NYPD 'Slowdown' Saves Taxpayers $10M A Week In Parking Ticket Fines
- NJ Man Arrested for Refusing to Hand Over Camera as "Evidence" After Cop Veers Off Road
- Rise of the Nanny Police State: Town Governments Across the US Ban Sledding
- Police in the US Kill Citizens at Over 70 Times the Rate of Other First-World Nations
- Cop Arrested for His Violent Behavior to be Reinstated Despite the Department Not Wanting Him
- Extended Video Shows Aftermath of Tamir Rice Shooting; Cops Gave No Aid, Restrained Sister
- Cop Trying to Kill the Family Dog, Kills Woman Instead, In Front of her Husband and 4-year-old Son
- New York Family Left Homeless After Police Rip Down Walls to Serve DWI Warrant

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Monday, December 31, 2012

U.S. Gov't Asks Federal Judge to Dismiss Cases of Americans Killed by Drones


Follow @infolibnews!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src='//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,'script','twitter-wjs'); Joe Wright

As Americans mourn the deaths of 20 children and 6 adults in the Newtown, CT tragedy - and the gun control debate has reached a fever pitch - autonomous killing systems are being funded by American taxpayers, and drone strikes continue to kill an increasing number of civilians abroad.

Barack Obama and the U.S. government policy makers have shown an incredible level of hypocrisy before; on the one hand lamenting such senseless deaths as have occurred in "mass shootings" while conducting their own mass killing, torture, and terror campaigns in foreign lands.

A culture of violence can't have it both ways, though, and the welcoming of drones into American skies by Congress is sure to unleash physical havoc shortly after concerns over surveillance and privacy are dismissed.

As a clear sign of what can be expected, the U.S. government has asked a federal judge to throw out a lawsuit brought by the families of three Americans killed by drone strikes in Yemen. If federal courts rule that these cases are without merit, it will set a dangerous precedent that only the executive branch of government can decide which Americans have a constitutional right to due process, while further enhancing a framework where the government will decide who is fit to be mourned and who should be forgotten.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- North Carolina: Driving While Nervous is Not a Crime
- Indefinite Detention Without Trial: Completely Unconstitutional, Yet Routine
- Not So Merry Christmas Drug Busts
- Utah: Traffic Stop Valid Even When Cop Causes Violation
- Santa Claus Arrested by DPS Capitol Police for Chalking Sidewalk
- San Diego Cops Beat & Pepper Spray Innocent Man With Down Syndrome
- Arizona Police Officer Caught Hiding Evidence In His Garage, Lying About It -- Keeps Job
- Denver Police Officer Found Guilty Of Using Badge To Sexually Assaulting Woman

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Video: 'Routine' Traffic Stop Gets Arkansas Cop Shot & Killed



Chris | InformationLiberation

An Arkansas cop engaged in a "routine" traffic stop apparently pulled over the wrong car which he "suspected" may have been uninsured. One of the men in the car pulled out a gun when the cop came to open his door and shot the cop point blank. The shooter in the video has been sentenced to be executed.

The video was only just released by the Arkansas police supposedly because the chief wanted his officers to "learn" from the incident. While being a police officer is not even in the top 10 most dangerous jobs and cops are most likely to die in traffic accidents, it's still completely idiotic the amount of danger police put themselves in to enforce ridiculous non-crimes. If the police chief really cares about officer safety, he should call for the end of the war on drugs and the repeal of all victimless crime laws.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Police: 17-Year-Old Strangled Himself With Seat Belt In Cop Car
- US Army Tactical Manuals Describe How to Control Domestic Insurrection
- Cops Strip Search Mom, "Forcibly" Pull Tampon Out of Her for Maybe Rolling Through Stop Sign
- Man Sentenced to 30 Days for Catching Rain Water on Own Property Enters Jail
- Cop Detains Woman, Allegedly Takes Her To Dark Alley & Asks To See Her Breasts
- Video: Police Raid On The Mansion Of Megaupload's Kim Dotcom
- Police Raid Wrong House, Kill Family Dog & Make Children Sit With Its Bloody Corpse
- Your "Duty" To Protect and Serve the Police

The only reason this video is making the rounds online is because the fuckers who want to ban guns outright are sensationalizing this statistically meaningless incident.

If you were smart, Chris, you would already know this and not post this shit.

More police officers commit suicide than are killed in the line of duty each year.

Sad but true................Found the right one I guess invasive checkpoints? routines stops? over zealous arrest happy pigs? Sucks majorly, but Im thinking he wasn't legal to carry in any way, so another law would make no difference.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Friend of man killed by Lake deputies said he was a 'happy go lucky guy'



By Erica Rodriguez and Elo?sa Ruano Gonz?lez, Orlando Sentinel

A 26-year-old pizza deliveryman shot and killed by a Lake County deputy was a "happy?go-lucky guy" who likely was simply trying to protect himself when deputies knocked on his door, his boss and friend said Monday.

[...]Scott worked for two years at Hungry Howie's Pizza in Leesburg, where he was known to joke around and could be trusted to run the store, said store owner Pat Casalaspro, a friend of Scott's. Scott worked late Saturday, he said, and had plans to watch movies with his live-in girlfriend that night. He said Scott probably didn't know who was outside and answered the door holding a gun.

"I guarantee you he was trying to protect himself," Casalaspro said, adding that Scott was not confrontational.

[...]The Florida Civil Rights Association in Orlando said it plans to look into the shooting to determine if deputies used excessive force. J. Willie David III, association president, called for the Sheriff's Office to adopt a policy "that requires its deputies to identify themselves when attempting to gain access to an individual's home."

Read More


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- VIDEO: California Police Open Fire & Unleash Dogs On Protesters Including Young Children
- Police Officer Killed Victim Of Break-In
- UK court acquits cop of killing man during anti-G20 protest
- Obama Administration to Review Clarence Aaron Commutation Request
- Ohio Police Claim 17-Yr-Old Pot Dealing High School Student A Drug "Kingpin"
- Police Chase Over Drugs Ends With Man Crashing Into Schoolbus Full Of Homeless Children
- Presumed Guilty in Florida: Drug "Crimes" with no Criminal Intent
- Minneapolis SWAT team leader faces first-degree assault charge (Video released)

'The Florida Civil Rights Association in Orlando ... called for the Sheriff's Office to adopt a policy "that requires its deputies to identify themselves when attempting to gain access to an individual's home."'

Aren't they already required to identify themselves before entering a private residence?

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Monday, July 30, 2012

'Dark Knight' Shooting Leaves at Least 12 Killed, 50 Injured




At least 12 people were killed and as many as 50 injured when a gunman in a gas mask opened fire about 12:30 a.m. in a theater showing the new Batman (TWX) movie in Aurora, near Denver, Colorado.

Police found explosives in the home of a 24-year-old man arrested in a car at the shopping mall that housed the theater, Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates told reporters. The suspect, James Holmes, has no known ties to terrorists, although the investigation continues, said a federal official, who lacked authorization to speak publicly and asked for anonymity.

?We have no evidence of additional shooters,? Oates said. ?The gunman was found in a car in the parking lot with a rifle, handgun, gas mask.?

?The Dark Knight Rises? is rated PG-13 and there were many children at the sold-out show, including some in costumes, at the Century 16 Movie Theaters at the Aurora Town Center. One of the dead was a 3-month-old child, the Denver Post reported.

Read More


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest General
- Denver Dark Knight Rises shooting: Amateur video shows audiences fleeing Aurora theatre
- Alex Jones Worships The Holy State
- Anarchast Episode 28 with James Guzman of TDV Media, marine edition!
- Maine Governor calls IRS the 'new Gestapo'
- Clemens Finally Wins the Drug War
- Chicago Mayor Says Decriminalize Marijuana
- Marijuana Legalization Breaks 60% in Colorado Poll
- "Support the Troops!" [Comic]

It should be embarassing to those in the know. This is so fake it makes me laugh.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Police Officer Killed Victim Of Break-In



Friends, family angry as questions go unanswered; one man charged
By Allison Manning


Maybe if the police officer had arrived just a minute later, the young man would still be alive.

That?s what the friends and family of Destin Thomas say, after Columbus police confirmed yesterday that it was one of their own officers who shot and killed Thomas while responding to a 911 call he had made on Tuesday morning.

Police gave few details yesterday about what happened between the 21-year-old Thomas and Officer William Kaufman, a 17-year veteran, citing the ongoing investigation.

They said that Kaufman shot Thomas twice, in his hip and chest. Thomas died at the scene.

?The fact that they?re trying to justify it, no apology or nothing, (just saying), ?Oh, we?re just doing what we were trained to do,?? said Thomas? cousin Derek Harris, 24. ?I didn?t know you were trained to kill the person you were supposed to help.?

Read More


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- VIDEO: California Police Open Fire & Unleash Dogs On Protesters Including Young Children
- UK court acquits cop of killing man during anti-G20 protest
- Obama Administration to Review Clarence Aaron Commutation Request
- Ohio Police Claim 17-Yr-Old Pot Dealing High School Student A Drug "Kingpin"
- Police Chase Over Drugs Ends With Man Crashing Into Schoolbus Full Of Homeless Children
- Presumed Guilty in Florida: Drug "Crimes" with no Criminal Intent
- Minneapolis SWAT team leader faces first-degree assault charge (Video released)
- Friends and family will protest deputy killing of innocent Leesburg man

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Sixteen Afghan civilians killed in rogue U.S. attack

By Ahmad Nadem and Ahmad Haroon

Sixteen Afghan civilians, including nine children, were shot dead in what witnesses described as a nighttime massacre on Sunday near a U.S. base in southern Afghanistan, and one U.S. soldier was in custody.

[...]"They (Americans) poured chemicals over their dead bodies and burned them," Samad told Reuters at the scene.

Neighbors said they had awoken to crackling gunfire from American soldiers, who they described as laughing and drunk.

"They were all drunk and shooting all over the place," said neighbor Agha Lala, who visited one of the homes where killings took place.

"Their (the victims') bodies were riddled with bullets."

Read More


Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Marijuana Sobriety Checkpoints: New Legislation to Outlaw Driving While Stoned
- Federal Court Blocks DEA Effort to Close Florida Pharmacies
- Filmmaker Releases Video Breakdown Of Illegal Traffic Stop By Cop Who Harassed Him
- Nine Things That Happen When You Film Police Encounters
- Police Shooting Witness Entered Witness Program After 'Barbaric Desecration'
- New York City: Prototype of the American Police State?
- Man flips cop off, wins $50,000
- Teenager arrested for anti-war comments made on Facebook

Now...who are the terrorists again? A rogue attack?

What's the difference between this berserker's murders and DOD's murders via missile drone? Easy and truthful answer: There's not a damn bit of difference between the two. DOD murders Afghan civilians and their troops murder Afghan civilians.

Coming soon to an American neighborhood near you.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here

Sunday, February 5, 2012

US regime claims to have killed Osama bin Laden

The US government claims to have killed the leader of Al-Qaeda today. A profoundly mysterious official enemy is now, allegedly, dead.

What a shame they could not capture and put the man on trial, if there was sufficient evidence to secure a lawful conviction. Instead, the world's most powerful state murdered bin Laden in an extrajudicial killing -- he was killed by a gunshot to the head (consistent with a professional assassination).

A trial, no matter how problematic, could have proved whether or not he was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, while providing answers to questions raised by the numerous conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11. A trial would also have demonstrated that the US retains the moral high-ground. Unfortunately neither of these things have been achieved by shooting bin Laden in the head, silencing him forever.

Many people around the world, including ordinary citizens, senior officials in US and allied governments, and prominent commentators the mass media, are declaring this "justice". The majority of people in the West seem to agree, evidently having had have had their sense of "justice" eroded to the point where they are satisfied with a trial by media. Those proclaiming "justice" are in effect accepting that if politicians and the mass media say somebody is guilty, that person must therefore be guilty, and as long as the right people say so no trial is necessary to properly scrutinise the facts.

Not everybody feels comfortable with the images of Americans cheering and waving flags in the streets, chanting "USA". They are celebrating an event which seems to warrant a more sobre reaction. An unarmed old man was killed by a unit of heavily-armed Navy Seals with air support. He was seen by many as a terrorist, and by others as a freedom-fighter standing-up to invincible enemies. He was killed in his home which looked more like a prison than a fortress.

In 2001, the 11 September attacks were cited as the single official reason for invading Afghanistan. American and British officials claimed that the government of Afghanistan was "harboring" bin Laden, but logic dictates that there was no specific evidence for this -- because of course apparently nobody knew where he was located. In reality, most of the alleged 9/11 attackers were nationals of Saudi Arabia. Now we are informed that bin Laden was located in Pakistan, so when is the invasion? Such blatant double-standards are symptomatic of false reasons being cited to justify what can accurately be described as illegal military operations with self-evident imperial objectives.

Al-Qaeda ("The Base") was created by the CIA in Afghanistan in the 1970s during the Cold War. Since 2001, Osama bin Laden has been a bogey-man figure, pointed to by politicians and the mass media while targets in the "War on Terror" shifted from place to place.

SOURCE

Osama bin Laden Killed: 'Justice Is Done,' President Says
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/osama-bin-laden-killed/story?id=13505703

BACKGROUND

CIA created al-Qaeda and gave $3 BILLION to Osama bin Laden
http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=0228

The truth about the US conquest of Afghanistan
http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/afghanistan.asp

FURTHER READING

Osama bin Laden corpse photo is fake
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/02/osama-bin-laden-photo-fake

"The Insider" mailing list article, 02 May 2011.


View the original article here

Saturday, August 27, 2011

US regime claims to have killed Osama bin Laden

The US government claims to have killed the leader of Al-Qaeda today. A profoundly mysterious official enemy is now, allegedly, dead.

What a shame they could not capture and put the man on trial, if there was sufficient evidence to secure a lawful conviction. Instead, the world's most powerful state murdered bin Laden in an extrajudicial killing -- he was killed by a gunshot to the head (consistent with a professional assassination).

A trial, no matter how problematic, could have proved whether or not he was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, while providing answers to questions raised by the numerous conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11. A trial would also have demonstrated that the US retains the moral high-ground. Unfortunately neither of these things have been achieved by shooting bin Laden in the head, silencing him forever.

Many people around the world, including ordinary citizens, senior officials in US and allied governments, and prominent commentators the mass media, are declaring this "justice". The majority of people in the West seem to agree, evidently having had have had their sense of "justice" eroded to the point where they are satisfied with a trial by media. Those proclaiming "justice" are in effect accepting that if politicians and the mass media say somebody is guilty, that person must therefore be guilty, and as long as the right people say so no trial is necessary to properly scrutinise the facts.

Not everybody feels comfortable with the images of Americans cheering and waving flags in the streets, chanting "USA". They are celebrating an event which seems to warrant a more sobre reaction. An unarmed old man was killed by a unit of heavily-armed Navy Seals with air support. He was seen by many as a terrorist, and by others as a freedom-fighter standing-up to invincible enemies. He was killed in his home which looked more like a prison than a fortress.

In 2001, the 11 September attacks were cited as the single official reason for invading Afghanistan. American and British officials claimed that the government of Afghanistan was "harboring" bin Laden, but logic dictates that there was no specific evidence for this -- because of course apparently nobody knew where he was located. In reality, most of the alleged 9/11 attackers were nationals of Saudi Arabia. Now we are informed that bin Laden was located in Pakistan, so when is the invasion? Such blatant double-standards are symptomatic of false reasons being cited to justify what can accurately be described as illegal military operations with self-evident imperial objectives.

Al-Qaeda ("The Base") was created by the CIA in Afghanistan in the 1970s during the Cold War. Since 2001, Osama bin Laden has been a bogey-man figure, pointed to by politicians and the mass media while targets in the "War on Terror" shifted from place to place.

SOURCE

Osama bin Laden Killed: 'Justice Is Done,' President Says
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/osama-bin-laden-killed/story?id=13505703

BACKGROUND

CIA created al-Qaeda and gave $3 BILLION to Osama bin Laden
http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=0228

The truth about the US conquest of Afghanistan
http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/afghanistan.asp

FURTHER READING

Osama bin Laden corpse photo is fake
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/02/osama-bin-laden-photo-fake

"The Insider" mailing list article, 02 May 2011.


View the original article here