Google Search

Showing posts with label Canadian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canadian. Show all posts

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Canadian Police Arrest Man for Photographing Cop Car as Daughter Records Chilling Scene


By Carlos Miller

A Canadian man receiving a parking citation in downtown Montreal decided to step out of his car and take a picture of the police car.

He ended up getting beat up, handcuffed and arrested.

All while his 17-year-old daughter video recorded the incident.

Now the video is going viral, a disturbing scene of a man screaming in pain as his daughter pleas for his safety, another chilling chapter in the War on Cameras.

Read More


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- "If We Have To Get A Warrant... We're Gonna Shoot & Kill Your Dogs... Ransack Your House"
- CPS Nabs Teenager Because She Was Hanging Out With Black People
- Pentagon Changes Drone Strike Rules To Permit Bombing Civilians
- Around Here, We Don't Call Internal Affairs
- Does Politeness Constitute Probable Cause?
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- Lawyer For Cop Charged In Beating Death Of Homeless Man Claims Officer Didn't Use ENOUGH Force
- The Sadistic Profligacy of Sheriff Joe Arpaio

"Mommy, call the police."

In those 4 words the young girl articulates the underlying issue...

Who do you call when those charged with keeping the peace are the ones creating the problem?

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Canadian Woman Threatens To Film Out Of Control Cop, Cop Beats Her In "Sexual Assault" & Charges Her For Resisting


Chris | InformationLiberation

A Canadian dental surgeon says an out of control cop beat her on the side of the road, slammed her face into the pavement after she was handcuffed, and committed a "sexual assault" by repeatedly hitting her breasts while she was restrained -- all because he was infuriated she threatened to record him with her cell phone.

GlobalNews.ca reports:

EDMONTON ? A Camrose woman says she was left battered and bruised on Saturday following a traffic stop she will never forget.

Dr. Simona Tibu was on her way to see patients in Edmonton that morning, when she was pulled over by an Alberta sheriff for speeding.

Tibu claims the sheriff violently hit her window. When she opened it, he asked her to hand over her drivers license and insurance information.

?I advised him I would do so if he stopped hitting my car.?

Tibu also told him that if he didn?t, she would record him on her phone.

?At that moment, he became very violent. He took his hands through my window, hit my right hand, where I have bruises on it, smashed my cell phone out of my hands, and told me? ?Get out of your car now.??

She listened to the sheriff, who handcuffed her. With her arms behind her back, Tibu says the sheriff then began hitting her breasts.

Fearing for her life, she began to scream, hoping someone would hear her and help.

Tibu says that only made the sheriff even more aggressive. She claims he pressed his knees into hers until they were bruised, and pushed his pelvis into her back.

?I felt a hit in my head then he smashed my head on the pavement on the road until I was full of blood. Then he told me, ?Now I?m going to walk all over you.??

She remembers seeing a man show up, and eventually an RCMP officer and ambulance arrived at the scene.

Tibu was taken to hospital. She suffered bruises all over her body, including her breasts.

After speaking with an RCMP officer, she was shocked to learn she was being charged with resisting arrest, but the sheriff involved in the alleged incident wasn?t facing any charges.

?I am going to make justice happen,? she says. ?No individual should be handcuffed and be beaten by the police. No women should be handcuffed by the police and be sexually assaulted.?

According to this post on West Coast Native News Dr. Tibu filed for and received a restraining order against one "Sherrif Behills."

It appears the police have still yet to respond.
_
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Cop Convicted Of Second-Degree Manslaughter For Shooting 5-Yr-Old Boy In Back Of Head Gets Record Expunged, Now Free Again To Become An Officer
- Boston Cop Shoves Videographer, Then Threatens to Arrest Him for "Battery On A Police Officer"
- Man Refuses To ID At Texas Border Patrol Checkpoint, Checkpoint Officer Says "Get The F*ck Out of Here" & Waves Him Through
- Attorneys For Ibragim Todashev's Father Say There's NO Evidence He Was Armed When FBI Executed Him
- Philly Cop Filmed Punching Small Woman In Face At Puerto Rican Day Parade Gets Job Back With Full Back Pay
- Oregon Deputies Caught on Dash Cam Acknowledging Illegal Traffic Stop
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- "They Kidnapped Our Child": Why CPS Needs Transparency Now

OMG, I can't believe this happened not far from where I live. How are we to respect the police if they do not respect us. Is there some kind of petition we can sign to have this sheriff lose his job. Alberta should never have decided to get sheriffs. And now that Canada may be allowing US cops to work on our streets???? How many more men and women will get beat up? Theses pigs are out of control. she's so beautiful! now she'll have a scar on her beautiful face you fucking faggot! From now on, if your wife or children are stopped by the cops tell them to call you and keep their windows closed until you arrive and gather up friends and family and provide an ARMED escort home. if a first cop who stops you is overly aggressive you should say back off while i call a legitimate cop, i don't know you, i don't trust you, you are violating your own laws you piece of shit, do not attack me or i will defend myself.

obviously the first cop will get furious you resist his tyranny, and will attack,

that's when you shoot the flying fuck out of him, don't stop firing until he stops moving.

afraid of jailtime? afraid of death? then don't tell me you're a Christian, God hates liars.

atheists, agnostics, etc., go ahead and bend over, your years on earth are all you had anyway.

kill, evil, now.

This reminds me of an old headline from several years ago: More beat cops for Edmonton. Now we know why they are called beat cops, ha ha. You do not tell cops you will comply with them 'on condition X'. No, it doesn't work that way.

Is it possible that this officer used excessive force? Yes. Do I believe it? I don't know, maybe if this woman wasn't being defensive and essentially baiting the cop from the get-go I would be more apt to believe her, but right now it sounds like she was being unnecessarily non-compliant, the officer pulled her out, she resisted, and she was forcefully arrested. You don't play fucking mind games with officers - how is he to know she was grabbing a phone and not a gun? Being a woman doesn't mean you get soft baby treatment when being defiant. If you resist arrest, you get your ass shoved to the ground and cuffed.

If the rest of her story *is* true, that's one thing, but I have a feeling there is a lot of exaggeration and compensatory finger pointing going on here.

to anon 24215 - you can actually look at those pictures, and know that it is a female and a male cop involved, and say what you said?

all i can say is good luck when you meet God, you're in for a rude awakening.

as for "you can't do this to cop", again you're sinning against God by placing a human - ANY human - before God. you don't have to believe in God, i couldn't care less about you, but you've been warned. good luck with that.

@ 24215
if you were a cop and you just handcuffed a woman, hence she's laying on the ground because your small dick dictated you to put her there and you keep beating the poor woman do you think you just earn a medal? no my friend you just became the lowest scumbag on earth. in the police business there's no place for ego, because you're armed and in cases like this the opponent is defenceless and there's no place for rage like this in the police force or anywhere else for that matter.
it's true, neither of us knows what happened exactly but unfortunately that's why it's called "police brutality" and it happens like it or not.
i really hope that if this was such a case that piece of shit get's jail time. at least that's justice

learn more about police brutality: www.policebrutality.info

Absolute disgrace. That us tax payers are paying for such stupid egotistical law enforcement such as him . Wow , a big Harry ass galoot like him saying he was assaulted by a tiny woman like her absolutely appalling . And then to hand cuff her and then beat her like he did . That so sick and you wonder why people in society are loseing respect towards law inforcement , it's because there's stupid psychologist doing the screenings and approving these morons . So last but not least I'd love to meet this arsehole that beat that lady , I'd give him a taste of his own medicine . He should be put in jail for what he did . And then the wolves can take care of him and jail . You insecure control FREEK . Lol. And ya wonder why cops like him are getting there lives taken , what a joke , who in the hell wants to respect an inforcer like him ? If I ever had a chance to meet him I'd honestly pound his face in

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Canadian minister accuses surveillance bill's opponents of siding with child pornographers

The Canadian Press

OTTAWA?The government says anyone who opposes federal plans to make electronic surveillance easier for police and spies is siding with child pornographers.

It?s the first salvo in a battle that will resume Tuesday when the government reintroduces legislation that would expand online monitoring powers.

The issue pits the desire of intelligence and law-enforcement officials to have easier access to information about Internet users against the individual?s right to privacy.

Asked Monday in the House of Commons about the coming bill, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews told a Liberal MP he could either stand with the government or ?with the child pornographers? prowling online.

Read More


Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- Presenting PreCheck: Fascist and Furious
- Cyberwar Is the New Yellowcake
- Prepper Declared "Mentally Defective," Put On FBI List
- Crazy Anti-Drug Ad Tells Kids to Do Parkour Instead of Drugs
- Justice Department Wants $5 Million To Bolster Its Efforts As Hollywood's Private Police Force
- UK Now Seizing Music Blogs (With American Domains) Over Copyright Claims
- Dawn of the Drones: The Realization of the Total Surveillance State
- Flying the Fascist Skies

EXPECT MORE GOVERNMENT / POLICE CORRUPTION WITH NO-WARRANT SEARCHES

Note: Canada will have the same loss of electronic privacy and civil liberties that the Obama Government recently proposed?below. Canada has signed with the U.S. reciprocal asset forfeiture sharing agreements that allow the U.S. and Canadian Police to seize assets from Canadian Citizens based on a Canadian?s electronic communications. But now Canadian police want the power to search Canadian?s electronic communications without a warrants.

The U.S. Government wants the power without a warrant, to introduce as evidence in criminal prosecutions and government civil trials, any phone call record, email or Internet activity. That would open the door for Police to take out of context, any innocent?hastily written email, fax or phone call record to allege a crime or violation was committed to cause a person?s arrest, fines and or civil asset forfeiture of their property. There are more than 350 laws and violations that can subject property to government asset forfeiture. Government civil asset forfeiture requires only a civil preponderance of evidence for police to forfeit property, little more than hearsay.

If the Justice Department has its way, any information the FBI derives from circumventing the Fourth Amendment, i.e. (no warrant searches) of Web Server Records; a Citizen?s Internet Activity, personal emails; fax / phone calls may be used by the FBI for (fishing expeditions; to issue subpoenas in hopes of finding evidence or to prosecute Citizens for any alleged crime or violation. Consider that neither Congress nor the courts?determined what Bush II NSA electronic surveillance, perhaps illegal could be used by police or introduced into court by government to prosecute Americans criminally or civilly. If U.S. Justice Department is permitted (No-Warrant) surveillance of all electronic communications, it is problematic state and local law enforcement agencies and private government contractors will want access to prior Bush II /NSA and other government illegally obtained electronic records not limited to Americans? Internet activity; private emails, faxes and phone calls to secure evidence to arrest Americans, assess fines and or civilly forfeit their homes, businesses and other assets under Title 18USC and other laws. Of obvious concern, what happens to fair justice in America if police become dependent on ?Asset Forfeiture? to help pay their salaries and budget operating costs?

The ?Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000? (effectively eliminated) the ?five year statue of limitations? for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture: the statute now runs five years (from the date) police allege they ?learned? an asset became subject to forfeiture. It is foreseeable should (no warrant) government electronic surveillance be approved; police will relentlessly sift through Citizen and businesses? (government retained Internet data), emails and phone communications to discover possible crimes or civil violations. A corrupt despot U.S. Government too easily can use no-warrant-(seized emails, Internet data and phone call information) to blackmail Americans, corporations and others in the same manner Hitler utilized his police state passed laws to extort support for the Nazi fascist government, including getting parliament to pass Hitler?s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that suspended the Constitutional Freedoms of German Citizens. A Nazi Government threat of ?Property Seizure? Asset Forfeiture of an individual or corporation?s assets was usually sufficient to ensure Nazi support.

Under U.S. federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property. Most U.S. Citizens, property and business owners that defend their assets against Government Civil Asset Forfeiture claim an ?innocent owner defense.? This defense can become a ?Catch 22? a criminal prosecution trap for both guilty and innocent property owners. Any fresh denial of guilt made to government when questioned about committing a crime ?even when you did not do the crime? may (involuntarily waive) a defendant?s right to assert in their defense?the ?Criminal Statute of Limitations? past for prosecution; any fresh denial of guilt even 30 years after a crime was committed may allow Government prosecutors to use old and new evidence, including information discovered during a Civil Asset Forfeiture Proceeding to launch a criminal prosecution. For that reason many innocent Americans, property and business owners are reluctant to defend their property and businesses against Government Civil Asset Forfeiture.

Re: waiving Criminal Statute of Limitations: see USC18, Sec.1001, James Brogan V. United States. N0.96-1579. U.S. See paragraph (6) at:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/96-1579.ZC1.html

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here