Google Search

Showing posts with label Taxes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taxes. Show all posts

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Colo. Politicians Threaten to Repeal Marijuana Legalization If Voters Don't Approve High Taxes


Chris | InformationLiberation

Politicians in Colorado are threatening voters they'll repeal the legalization of marijuana unless they approve an outrageously high 30% tax rate on the sale of the plant.

Via KKTV:

Marijuana legalization may have received more votes from Coloradans than President Obama--who carried the state--but some lawmakers are still mulling over a repeal.

As the debate over how to tax marijuana rages on, sister station KCNC reports that a draft bill floating around the Capitol proposes repealing recreational marijuana if voters don't approve a 15 percent excise tax on retail pot and a 15 percent marijuana sales tax.[...]

Some lawmakers argue that the purpose of legalizing marijuana was to bring more revenue into the state, particularly for education, and that if it's not accomplishing that it shouldn't be legal.

In other words, your freedoms are only permitted so long as they provide the state with revenue.
_
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.

(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Politics/Corruption
- Obama Supporters Petition to Repeal 6th and 7th Amendments (Right to Speedy & Public Trial by Jury)
- Oh Look, Rep. Mike Rogers Wife Stands To Benefit Greatly From CISPA Passing...
- Congress Quickly And Quietly Rolls Back Insider Trading Rules For Itself
- Travis County TX DA Rosemary Lehmberg Arrested For DWI
- Hacked Photos Show Colin Powell at Bohemian Grove
- Their Blackmail is called "Legislation"; Our Activism is called "Blackmail"
- NY Councilwoman Seeks Year in Prison, $1,000 Fine for Buying Knockoff Handbags
- Hawaii Marijuana Decriminalization Bill Dies

So why didn't they do this before? LOL! I kid you not, the verification code for this post is FUCKW Hehe, yikes, I assure you it's random :) ! Why not implement taxes on ski lifts or something? You know, they are a gateway for people to enjoy their vacations and all. Plus, they're more dangerous to your health than cannabis will ever be...

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Woman injured in LAPD manhunt says cops won't pay taxes on replacement truck


By Arturo Garcia


The attorney for a woman who was mistakenly targeted by Los Angeles police during the manhunt for Christopher Dorner in February has accused the department of breaking its promise of a new truck for her.

?You tried to murder the woman, you put 102 bullet holes in her truck,? Glen Jonas told KNBC-TV on Monday. ?Now you?re telling her she can?t have a 4-wheel drive.?

Jonas his client, 47-year-old Maggie Carranza, refused a police offer of a new Ford F-150 truck if she agreed to pay taxes on it, in part because it meant Carranza would have to pay an additional $10,000 in personal income taxes she cannot afford. He said the department?s offer also barred Carranza from selling the vehicle for a year.

Read More


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- VIDEO: Aussie Cops Assault Youth for Filming, Threaten Him With Arrest
- Man Charged With Disorderly Conduct For Telling Cop to 'Go F**k Himself'
- Man Faces Five Years in Prison for Releasing Balloons on Beach as a Romantic Gesture
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- 'Lady Liberty' Tased by Fort Worth officer
- Federal Appeals Court Busts Police For Contempt Of Cop Arrest
- Phoenix Cop Made Famous On YouTube For Tackling 15-Yr-Old Girl Calls 5-Day Suspension Too Harsh
- Undercover Cops Ensnare a Special Ed Student, Get Him Expelled

what was the total number of rounds fired?so we know how many missed the truck completely.these 2 were lucky that this group of cops were such bad shots.now the mental midgets egos are leading again and doing everything they can to make it not their fault. criminals don't pay for their damage.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Monday, March 25, 2013

Remarkable New Puerto Rican Law Exempts U.S. Citizens From Multitude Of Taxes


Chris | InformationLiberation

A remarkable new law passed last year in Puerto Rico reportedly exempts U.S. citizens who choose to become residents of the territory from a multitude of taxes. Bloomberg reports John Paulson, the hedge fund manager who made $3.7 billion shorting sub prime mortgages in 2007 before their crash, is possibly looking at moving there, and many wealthy individuals involved in internet, software, and financial companies are looking at taking advantage of the new law.

Via Bloomberg:

John Paulson, a lifelong New Yorker, is exploring a move to Puerto Rico, where a new law would eliminate taxes on gains from the $9.5 billion he has invested in his own hedge funds, according to four people who have spoken to him about a possible relocation.

Ten wealthy Americans have already taken advantage of the year-old Puerto Rican law that lets new residents pay no local or U.S. federal taxes on capital gains, according to Alberto Baco Bague, Secretary of Economic Development and Commerce of Puerto Rico. The marginal tax rate for affluent New Yorkers can exceed 50 percent on ordinary income.

Paulson, 57, recently looked at real estate in the exclusive Condado neighborhood of San Juan, where an 8,379- square-foot penthouse, complete with six underground parking spaces, lists for $5 million. The area is home to St. John?s School, a private English-language academy where he and his wife could send their two children, said the people, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private.

[...]

The Puerto Rican tax law provides a boon for someone like Paulson, who earns most of his money from investments. The federal rate for top earners in the U.S. is 23.8 percent on long-term capital gains and dividends and 39.6 percent on ordinary income, which includes short-term gains and interest. State and local taxes can push the marginal rate for rich New Yorkers higher.

Under the Puerto Rican law, any capital gains accrued after a person moves there would be tax free. Dividend and interest income paid by U.S. companies would still be subject to U.S. federal taxes, though would not be taxed locally.

In addition, new residents can benefit from another new law that taxes business income earned in Puerto Rico at 4 percent. That law could potentially apply to hedge fund fees earned by a resident for services rendered for U.S.-based clients, said Gabriel Hernandez, one of the framers of the Puerto Rican tax law and head of the tax division of BDO Puerto Rico PSC.

Hernandez now gets a call every day from wealthy individuals involved in Internet, software or financial companies who are interested in moving to the island, he said. He declined to name any of the business people who have relocated or who are currently contemplating such a move.

Preferential Treatment

Residents of Puerto Rico, an unincorporated territory of the U.S., typically pay a local tax rate of as much as 33 percent, according to Gabriel. They don?t pay U.S. taxes on income from Puerto Rico, but are taxed on dividends and interest from U.S. companies. They are not subject to capital gains taxes in the U.S. and pay a 10 percent capital gains tax locally, from which new residents are exempt.

The preferential treatment for the new residents aims to promote investments in real estate, boost services and consumption, and encourage foreign service providers to move their businesses to the country, said Puerto Rico?s Baco Bague.

In addition to the 10 wealthy individuals who have already relocated to Puerto Rico to take advantage of the new laws, 40 more are currently talking to the government about moving and have brought their families to look at housing and schools, said Baco Bague. About 35 percent are hedge-fund managers, he added.

Government Contract

One hedge-fund manager, Pascal Forest, has taken the additional step of setting up his firm, Forest Investments LLC, in San Juan. Forest, a former portfolio manager at London-based BlueGold Capital Management LLP, said the tax incentives played into his decision to move to the island, as did his wife, who is Puerto Rican and wanted to come home after 16 years.

In order to become eligible for the new tax breaks, a person must live on the island for at least 183 days a year and prove that a preponderance of his social and family connections are there. Any person who moves to the island signs a contract with the government that guarantees the tax break through Dec. 31, 2035.

?You have to actually become a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico, bring your children,? said Fernando Goyco-Covas, a tax lawyer at Adsuar Muniz Goyco Seda & Perez-Ochoa PSC. ?You cannot do this just claiming you are a resident.?

Here's further analysis on the act from Price Waterhouse Cooper, AMG PR Law, and Puerto Rico's Department of Economic Development and Commerce.

This act is quite remarkable, for Hedge Fund managers who make most of their money through "carried interest," which is taxed as capital gains, the savings could be massive. It appears from my reading of their government's report on the acts, they seem to suggest you can open your business in Puerto Rico and become a resident, potentially be exempted from U.S. income taxes per an old tax agreement despite being a U.S. citizen, and so long as you only service non-Puerto Ricans you could only pay 4% corporate income tax on your earnings, nothing on your non-U.S. based investments, and even zero property tax on your new Puerto Rican corporate headquarters. Admittedly, they're probably excluding some taxes, I know for a fact you're still liable to pay social security taxes, and I suspect they're not including "local" Puerto Rican income taxes which range from 7 to 33 percent on incomes over $60,000. Regardless, even if you do have to pay U.S. income taxes, or instead "local" Puerto Rican income taxes, the savings from the other tax exemptions could still be significant.

As someone looking to leave the U.S. but reluctant to cut all ties and renounce citizenship, Puerto Rico is looking quite attractive.
_
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Economy
- Puerto Rico To Become Epic Tax Haven For U.S. Citizens?: 'The Idea Is To Turn It Into An Alternative To Singapore'
- Wrong Legislative Thought Of The Day: An Email Tax To Save The Post Office
- Jim Rogers: We're Wiping Out The Savings Class Globally, To Terrible Consequence
- Stock Rally Will End Badly This Year: Marc Faber
- Government thinks that you are an idiot
- Amateur Beats Gov't at Digitizing Newspapers: Tom Tryniski's Weird, Wonderful Website
- The Fed's Tightening Pipe Dream
- Bullet Proof Vest Company Begins Making Armored Clothing For Children

Like every immigrant in the history of the world, Mr. Paulson has decided that he wants to consider leaving his current home. The reasons for that seem to be the reality that the US, NY, and NYC need money and with a tax system which has the top 1% paying over a third of the total of tax dollars collected is tapping these "Golden Geese" more and more. Whether you ,I, or Warren Buffett think it fair is irrelevant. Mr. Paulson does not think it fair so he is looking to the exits to sever his FUTURE US, NY, and NYC tax liability.

The second part of this decision process is "Where to go?" PR is an option but so are a number of other places such as Canada, UK, New Zealand, Australia , Switzerland and several other European destination. "But those are all high tax rate countries!" Is the usual knee jerk reaction. The correct response is that Mr. Paulson would use LEGAL tax planning to vastly reduce his tax bill. For example, in Canada he could limit his Canadian tax obligation to ONLY Canadian source income and capital gains. Also Canada has no gift or estate tax (unlike Puerto Rico). Notably, it would be much easier for him to recreate his hedge fund in Toronto vs. San Juan. Finally Toronto is only one hour by air from Manhattan, definitely closer than PR.

@Mr. Lesperance:
I live in Australia and am a dual citizen. The only tax benefit of being an Australian is that any money you earn outside of Australia is non-taxable. All income within Oz is highly taxable. Need to pay for socialism somehow. You want a tax free zone? Try Thailand or Singapore. Or Vanuatu. Puerto Is not a good choice for many reasons.

Used to live in Canada and to get permanent residency you must pass the 100 point test. If you are over 55, you won't pass. You can buy your way in but it is tenuous.

There is always Belize, if you enjoy roughing it.

Good luck.

If you're not a U.S. citizen, you're not subject to a global income tax, so moving to Puerto Rico would be pointless for tax reasons as most of the Caribbean islands have lower and better tax regimes. This Puerto Rico deal is unique mainly because you don't have to renounce US citizenship to take advantage of it.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Monday, February 27, 2012

Obama: Not Raising Taxes Is a Form of Government Spending

By Fred Lucas

Announcing his budget plans for fiscal year 2013 in an address at Northern Virginia Community College in Annandale, Va., President Barack Obama characterized the current income tax rates--signed into law by President Bush a decade ago--as a form of government spending.

Essentially, the president said that the federal government "spends" when it does not raise taxes.

?Right now, we?re scheduled to spend more than $1 trillion more on what was intended to be a temporary tax cut for the wealthiest two percent of Americans,? Obama said. ?We?ve already spent about that much. Now we?re expected to spend another $1 trillion. Keep in mind, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle class households. You?ve heard me say it: Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.?

Despite the bankruptcies of three green energy companies that received heavy doses of federal tax dollars, Obama also pledged Monday to ?double down on clean energy.?

Read More


Latest Economy
- Jeffrey Tucker makes the Case Against the Federal Reserve and the Banking Cartel
- Tom Woods Interviews Lew Rockwell
- Another Fed-Backed Solar Company Goes Bankrupt
- Fed Should Heed Lessons of 1920 Recession Response, Grant Says
- Keynesians Jump The Gun on Inflation
- Doug Casey Interviewed by Kerry Lutz
- Obama: Lets Debase Our Coinage Even Further to "Save Money"
- Obama Proposes Doubling Dividend Tax on Wealthy

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here

Friday, February 10, 2012

CBO: Taxes Will *Shoot Up by More Than 30 Percent* Over Next 2 Years

By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - The amount of money the federal government takes out of the U.S. economy in taxes will increase by more than 30 percent between 2012 and 2014, according to the Budget and Economic Outlook published today by the CBO.

At the same time, according to CBO, the economy will remain sluggish, partly because of higher taxes.

"In particular, between 2012 and 2014, revenues in CBO's baseline shoot up by more than 30 percent," said CBO, "mostly because of the recent or scheduled expirations of tax provisions, such as those that lower income tax rates and limit the reach of the alternative minimum tax (AMT), and the imposition of new taxes, fees, and penalties that are scheduled to go into effect."

The U.S. economy, CBO projects, will perform "below its potential" for another six years and unemployment will remain above 7 percent for another three.

Read More


Latest Economy
- Currency Wars
- The Seven Lies of Robert Reich
- Gold Procrastinators: The Endless Agony
- Surrounded by the Achievements of Capitalism | Jeffrey A. Tucker
- 60 Minutes Highlights Free Market Conservationism
- 16 Statistics Which Show That The Number Of Americans Dependent On The Government Is At An All-Time High
- Conning the Poor
- Zero Percent Uber Alles

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Geithner: Taxes on 'Small Business' Must Rise So Government Doesn't 'Shrink'

By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told the House Small Business Committee on Wednesday that the Obama administration believes taxes on small business must increase so the administration does not have to ?shrink the overall size of government programs.?

The administration?s plan to raise the tax rate on small businesses is part of its plan to raise taxes on all Americans who make more than $250,000 per year?including businesses that file taxes the same way individuals and families do.

Read More


Latest Politics/Corruption
- Twisted ethics of an expert witness
- US Pledges $300 Million More for Central America Drug War
- 14 Reasons Why Rick Perry Would Be A Really, Really Bad President
- Supremes Rule EPA Final Arbiter on Carbon Dioxide
- Gov. worker claims to see shark off S.F. coast, Gov. bans surfing and swimming for five days
- NYT's Love Affair With Fascism Continues
- FDA sends US marshals to seize elderberry juice concentrate, deems it 'unapproved drug'
- Church fined $4,000 for 'excessive tree pruning'

Thats right! We have to tax those small businesses so our benevolent government can continue to metastasize, er, uh, I mean GROW! "Our Government" meaning Exxon, Walmart, GE, Raytheon, Monsanto, Dupont, Goldman Sachs, Google, Apple etc....................

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here