Cop Filmed Playing Poker On In-Car Computer Driving During Rush Hour On Unplowed Road

Chris | InformationLiberation

The new year brought some 40,000 news laws into effect throughout the United States. In Chicago, one of those laws was a ban on using a cell phone while driving. The studies which showed such bans may lead to more accidents because people hide their phones below eye level rather than stop using them were ignored in place of political hysteria and the demand to "do something."

Incidentally, the people tasked with enforcing such a cell phone ban have dashmounted computers with huge LCD monitors in their patrol cars. As you can see in this video just posted to YouTube, some use these in-car computers to play online poker while driving in rush hour traffic on unplowed roads during the "polar vortex."

Cops engaged in such "typing while driving" incidents regularly crash into people while casually using their in-car computer. Here's a local news report out of Arlington, Texas showing it's an epidemic. Nonetheless, cops are explicitly exempt from all these distracted driving laws.

_
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.

(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Capital Punishment for Traffic Violations
- Police Shoot Man Assembling Toy Gun While Sitting In His Own Car
- Dashcam Video Shows Scene As Officer Shoots 14-Yr-Old With Toy Gun
- Father Says He's Being Jailed For Paying Too Much Child Support & Over Visiting His Son [Updated]
- San Diego Deputy Threatens To 'Shove' Camera Light Up Videographer's 'A**'
- Video captures moment PCSO who pulled over a driver was then arrested HIMSELF for being twice the drink-drive limit by police officers he called for back-up
- The Right to Resist -- and the Duty to Interpose
- Texas Game Wardens Prepare for War

"40,000 new laws...."

here we go again..... "if a tree falls in the forest, and, nobody is there to hear it, does it make a sound?"

telling people that the government has written-up 40,000 new "RULES" ("laws" are inherent), I would liken to the age-old question I've quoted above. Perhaps, the government should be asking: "if there's nobody left who believes in 'government,' does it exist?"

wow, from 10 commandants, to a simple (CON)stitution, to 40,000 fake-believe laws in 2014..... i'll call "b/s" if no one else has the b@ll$ to.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

View the original article here

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Bandwidth Throttling, and Breaking Promises on the Internet

by Stephan Kinsella

I taught computer law in 1998-1999 at South Texas College of Law. How things have changed. The course would now probably be called ?Internet Law? or Cyberlaw, though much of the subject matter would be similar (online contracts, spam, computer/Internet related crimes, intellectual property as applied to computer related issues, privacy and data collection, and jurisdictional issues). One thing we covered was the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, or CFAA (wikipedia; statute). The case we studied here was United States v. Morris,

an appeal of the conviction of Robert Tappan Morris for creating and releasing the Morris worm, one of the first Internet-based worms. This case resulted in the first conviction under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

The aspect of the case we focused on was the fact that someone could be found guilty of tampering under the CFAA even if it couldn?t be shown that he intended to cause damage; the mere unauthorized access was sufficient for conviction.

Like many federal statutes, the scope is arbitrary, artificial, and unjust, and the terms often vague and unclear, and thus subject to manipulation and extension by the state, prosecutors, and judges. (This is one reason legislation is an inappropriate way of ?making? law ? see my "Legislation and Law in a Free Society.") Thus, we now have the CFAA being used in, of all things, the ?Net Neutrality? debate. As discussed by Internet lawyer Evan Brown, in a recent case, some

plaintiffs sued Time Warner (the provider of Road Runner High Speed Online internet access), alleging, among other things, that Time Warner's alleged "throttling" of plaintiffs' internet communications violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 USC 1030 ("CFAA"). Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that without their authorization, Time Warner sent forged reset packets which frustrated plaintiffs' peer-to-peer communications (e.g., BitTorrent and other P2P mechanisms) as well as their use of Skype.

The court ?denied the motion to dismiss and let the case move forward.? So now it?s potentially a federal crime to throttle bandwidth to make Internet communications more efficient. Incredible. (The opinions is here.)

See also the recent column by Orin Kerr about possible uses of/extensions of the CFAA to apply it to ?breaking promises? on the Internet. As he writes there:

Tomorrow's Wall Street Journal is running an op-ed I authoredon the proposed amendments to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. It begins:

Imagine that President Obama could order the arrest of anyone who broke a promise on the Internet. So you could be jailed for lying about your age or weight on an Internet dating site. Or you could be sent to federal prison if your boss told you to work but you used the company's computer to check sports scores online. Imagine that Eric Holder's Justice Department urged Congress to raise penalties for violations, making them felonies allowing three years in jail for each broken promise. Fanciful, right?

Think again. Congress is now poised to grant the Obama administration's wishes in the name of "cybersecurity."

The little-known law at issue is called the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. It was enacted in 1986 to punish computer hacking. But Congress has broadened the law every few years, and today it extends far beyond hacking. The law now criminalizes computer use that "exceeds authorized access" to any computer. Today that violation is a misdemeanor, but the Senate Judiciary Committee is set to meet this morning to vote on making it a felony.

The problem is that a lot of routine computer use can exceed "authorized access." Courts are still struggling to interpret this language. But the Justice Department believes that it applies incredibly broadly to include "terms of use" violations and breaches of workplace computer-use policies.

Breaching an agreement or ignoring your boss might be bad. But should it be a federal crime just because it involves a computer?

Is this any surprise in an age where normal people are convicted of ?wire fraud? or ?mail fraud?, statutes originally ?meant? for organized crime? (Hmm, ?mail fraud??yet another reason to let the US postal service wither and die.)

1. A Libertarian Take on Net Neutrality; Net Neutrality, Congress, and Obama: The Scuffle Continues; Against Net Neutrality; Net Neutrality Developments; see also Harvard's Yochai Benkler on Net Neutrality and Innovation. []

2. See his post ISP's alleged throttling of BitTorrent and Skype violates Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; also see the discussion by Brown and others in this week?s episode of This Week in Law []

Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- FBI's 'Stingray' Cellphone Tracker Stirs a Fight Over Search Warrants, Fourth Amendment
- Another TSA Employee Accused of Rape
- NYPD planted undercover cops at 'Ground Zero Mosque' protests last year
- Big Sis Tags Coffee Cups With Big Brother Eye
- E-Verify: De Facto National ID and the End of Privacy
- Congress Debating If Putting A Fake Name On Facebook Should Be A Felony
- Enhanced Pat-Downs At NFL Games? America Is Rapidly Turning Into A High-Security Prison
- TSA and Unproductive Labor

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill

View the original article here