Chris | InformationLiberation
Gibson Guitar has agreed to pay a $300,000 ransom to the Federal government in order to be allowed to continue their business. Additionally, $262,000 worth of wood the government stole from them will not be returned. To add insult to injury, as CNN reports, the company was forced to make a "community service payment" of $50,000 to the U.S. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to "promote conservation and development of tree species used in making musical instruments."
The fact demand for said trees is what encourages them to be planted and conserved is ignored, but that's obviously irrelevant as this is about Federal bureaucrats feeling powerful.
The company was unable to challenge the government in court as going to court would have have forced them to further suspend all wood imports during what would have been a long drawn out trial, destroying their business in the process.
NYT reports:
Henry E. Juszkiewicz, Gibson?s chief executive, said the company still maintains the ebony from Madagascar was exported legally under that country?s laws. But he agreed to the settlement, he said, because it frees the guitar maker to continue importing wood from India, which, unlike Madagascar, is the major supplier of rosewood used in many fretboards.In total, it appears the company has had to pay around $2 million dollars to the U.S. government for the "privilege" of doing business. But hey, why should they complain? After all, "they didn't build the business themselves," as our Dear Leader said, they should just feel grateful to have the high honor of working as slaves to pay the salaries of bureaucrats actively working to destroy them. That's the new American way!For the last year, he said, the criminal proceedings in court had effectively cut off Gibson from sources of hardwood in both Madagascar and India, and its luthiers were forced to make guitars with laminated fret-boards or fingerboards made of woods not traditionally used in guitars, which some customers did not like.
?The alternative was pretty onerous,? he said. ?We would have had to have gone to trial and we would have been precluded from buying wood from our major source country. For the ability to carry on with the business and remove this onerous Sword of Damocles, if you will, we feel this is about as good a settlement as we can get.?
_
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.
(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
Latest Economy
- Boy Whose Hot Dog Cart Was Shut Down by the City of Holland Now Homeless
- Obama's Master Plan: Bailout Everyone
- Monsanto Awarded ONE BILLION Dollars Due To Patent Infringement For A Product That Was Never On The Market
- Social Security Ponzi Scheme Coming To An End
- New Hemp Bill Introduced in US Senate
- Submissiveness and Conformity in America's Business Leaders
- The Not So Super Hero
- Drawing back the Financial Iron Curtain to a Beautiful Anarchy w/ Jeffrey Tucker!
In a socialist country, free business is not welcome. Time for Gibson to move to another, more friendly, country?? Problem is, a rosewood-fretboard sounds and feels different than one made from ebony . One of the reasons rare trees are protected is exactly
so they can still be used in places where there is no substitution .
This is not 'socialism', it is 'idiocy' -
(admitted, the two can be more than hard to distinguish.. )
The greens are not 'socialists', they are disillusioned communists turned
overtly totalitarian . They might as well join the neo-cons, that's how crazy and fanatic they are .
Anyway, the price of ebony-fretboard equipped guitars is going to sky-rocket . Soon the gubernment will want some kind of 'endangered species license' if you want to even own one ..
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
