Google Search

Showing posts with label Policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Policy. Show all posts

Sunday, September 8, 2013

Cops Cry Foul Over Holder Marijuana Policy Move


by Phillip Smith

Organized law enforcement has some problems with Attorney General Holder's announcement last week that the Justice Department would not seek to block Colorado and Washington from implementing their marijuana legalization laws. In a joint letter last Friday, the leaders of seven major law enforcement groups expressed "extreme disappointment" with the move.

Those law enforcement groups are the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the Major County Sheriff's Association, the National Sheriff's Association, the Major Cities Chief's Association, the Association of State Criminal Investigative Agencies, the National Narcotics Officers' Associations Coalition, and the Police Executive Review Foundation.

While law enforcement has long argued that its role is to enforce the law, not set policy, the police associations clearly felt they should have had input in the Justice Department's decision-making process.

"It is unacceptable that the Department of Justice did not consult our organizations -- whose members will be directly impacted -- for meaningful input ahead of this important decision," the cops wrote. "Our organizations were given notice just thirty minutes before the official announcement was made public and were not given the adequate forum ahead of time to express our concerns with the Department?s conclusion on this matter. Simply 'checking the box' by alerting law enforcement officials right before a decision is announced is not enough and certainly does not show an understanding of the value the Federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement partnerships bring to the Department of Justice and the public safety discussion."

Beyond their issues with process, the law enforcement groups made it clear that they did not agree with the policy decision. The sky would fall if people could buy and smoke pot legally, the cops warned.

"The decision by the Department ignores the connections between marijuana use and violent crime, the potential trafficking problems that could be created across state and local boundaries as a result of legalization, and the potential economic and social costs that could be incurred," they wrote. "Communities have been crippled by drug abuse and addiction, stifling economic productivity. Specifically, marijuana?s harmful effects can include episodes of depression, suicidal thoughts, attention deficit issues, and marijuana has also been documented as a gateway to other drugs of abuse."

As if that were not enough, the cops also warned of "grave unintended consequences, including a reversal of the declining crime rates" of the past decades. But they didn't explain how allowing for legal marijuana sales in Colorado and Washington would cause crime to increase.

For the cops, though, the bottom line was not enforcing the law, but setting policy.

"Marijuana is illegal under Federal law and should remain that way," they wrote. "While we certainly understand that discretion plays a role in decisions to prosecute individual cases, the failure of the Department of Justice to challenge state policies that clearly contradict Federal law is both unacceptable and unprecedented. The failure of the Federal government to act in this matter is an open invitation to other states to legalize marijuana in defiance of federal law."

Maybe law enforcement should just go back to enforcing the laws, not trying to write them.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Cops Hold Children At Gunpoint For Climbing On School Roof, Rough Them Up, Arrest Them, School Defends Actions
- How Cops Treat Their Own Children
- Caught on Tape?Cops Beat, Taser and Knock Screaming Man's Teeth Out
- Massachusetts Cop Threatens to Smash Camera into Man's Face
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- Cop Flips Out On Teen Video Recording Him Making An Arrest, Arrests Him & Falsely Charges Him With Resisting & Obstruction
- TURF WAR: Blue on Blue Confrontation on NJ Turnpike
- Police vs. Pregnant Women

You fucking pigs need to quit being relevant, your shit does not wash with the masses and besides you fucking pukes do what we say not what you want to do and making policy , so when did that shit become your function in this society? Well you fucking facist goons, do tell. You fucktards do not get to write policy you just get to enforce laws We the People say you get to enforce, get it dimbulbs, now shut your pieholes and just do the fucking job your paid to do not the one you want to do. You worthless screwheads. Of Course they are upset. The drug war is a corner stone in the funding of their police budget. Nevermind how WRONG it is. And screw the people they make destitute and degrade. Like the colorfully worded fellow above said. The police do not dictate policy! Just do your same old, same old that you tell everyone while you violate them. "I'm just doin my job". Pigs. This article gives a clear insight into where the true collective allegiance of law enforcement in America actually stands, and that is not with the taxpayers, but with the criminals who make ridiculous laws and create ludicrous policies to profit from outright robbery through taxation which pays for most of the violation of actual justice. It should be blantantly obvious to the people of this country that we now live in a firmly entrenched police state and that law enforcement personnel are no longer employed by us, but by the rogue entities that have infiltrated the government and turned it against us.
We as a nation desperately need to take a step back for a better perspective and put some critical thought into who the actual bad guys really are nowadays.
Folks normally start questioning the source of a pervading stench when it becomes as foul and offensive as this one has become.
People have got to wake up and quell this uprising in a non-violent manner before the whole of it becomes an irreversible tragedy, because our days are numbered to preserve the freedom and liberty that we still possess.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Thursday, September 1, 2011

U.S. Mideast policy in a single phrase

by Glenn Greenwald

The CIA's spokesman at The?Washington?Post, columnist David?Ignatius, recently announced that the glorifying term "Arab Spring" is no longer being used by senior intelligence officials to describe democratic revolutions in the Middle East.??It has been replaced by the more "neutral" term "Arab transition,"?which, as Ignatius put it, "conveys the essential truth that nobody can predict just where this upheaval is heading."? Note that what was until very recently celebrated in American media circles as a joyous, inspirational awakening of?"democratic birth and freedom" has now been downgraded to an "upheaval" whose outcome may be odious and threatening.

That's not surprising.? As?I've written about several times, public opinion in those nations is so strongly opposed to the policies the?U.S. has long demanded -- and is quite hostile (more so than ever) to the?U.S. itself and especially Israel -- that allowing any form of democracy would necessarily be adverse to American and Israeli interests in that region?(at least as those two nations have long perceived of their "interests").? That's precisely why the U.S. worked so hard and expended so many resources for decades to ensure that brutal dictators ruled those nations and suppressed public opinion to the point of complete irrelevance (behavior which, predictably and understandably, exacerbated anti-American sentiments among the populace).

Read More


Latest Geopolitics
- 168 Children
- South Korea Fires Artillery Off Yeonpyeong After Hearing Shells From North
- Mexican Cocaine Kingpin Says U.S. Authorities Helped Protect His Drug Cartel
- Australia: Carbon price battle is lost, say experts
- North Korean Prisoner Kim Hye-sook Describes NK Government Gulags
- Next Up: Pakistan
- Fox News Video: U.S. Soldiers Guarding Opium Fields in Afghanistan
- Elite Bilderberg 2011 Meeting Draws Scrutiny

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


View the original article here

Friday, July 1, 2011

TSA Lies About Policy "Change" On Child Pat Downs

Steve Watson

With much fanfare this week, TSA head John Pistole announced before the Senate that the agency is changing its policy to stop airport screeners intrusively searching young children. However, we heard almost the exact same announcement last November, yet pat-downs on children have continued regardless.

At a meeting of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee in Washington, Pistole told the members that TSA agents will be instructed to make "repeated efforts" to resolve security screenings without conducting pat downs on children younger than 10 years old.

Pistole added that the policy change was spurred by the emergence of the video of 6-year old Anna Drexel, of Bowling Green, Ky., who was subjected to a full grope down by a TSA agent in early April. As we reported at the time, the girl's parents were forced to watch on in disbelief after being warned by TSA agents not to make a scene or face trouble.

During the hearing, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul had harsh words for Pistole about the TSA's procedures:

"This isn't to say we don't believe in safety procedures," Paul said. "But I think I feel less safe when we're doing these invasive exams on a 6-year-old. It makes me think that you're clueless, that you think she's going to attack our country, and that you're not doing your research on the people who would attack our country."

Pistole responded by claiming that "terrorists around the world have used children as suicide bombers" and that children must be treated by TSA agents according to "risk based security assessments."

The Drexel incident represents just one among many others recently where children have been repeatedly touched in intimate areas by TSA agents in the name of security.

In one case, the TSA defended the actions of two of it's agents who were photographed conducting a full body pat down on an eight-month old baby at Kansas City International Airport, saying they were adhering to procedure.

All of these incidents and more have caused a wave of public resentment directed toward the TSA. Therefore, according to Pistole, influencing the agency to ?change? it?s policy.

But hang on one minute here, haven?t we heard this before?

Back in November 2010, in response to a flood of complaints following the introduction of the TSA?s ?enhanced? pat-down procedure, which instructed agents to touch around breasts and genitals, Pistole announced that the agency had ?eliminated pat-downs for children under 12?.

"We've heard the concerns that have been expressed and agree that children under 12 should not receive that pat-down," Pistole said on NBC's Today Show.

On November 17, Pistole testified to Congress that ?children 12 and under are exempt from the enhanced pat-down?:

If that was true, why the need for this latest announcement? Pistole was flat out lying.

Indeed, the only ?change? to the TSA?s policy is that it now says it will ?make every effort? to exempt children under 10, where as before it said all children under 12 were unequivocally exempt.

This is why this week?s announcement will ultimately once again mean nothing. Until it is written into law to make TSA grope-downs illegal, there is no safety net against TSA tyranny.

We cannot simply take the word of an agency that has repeatedly lied to the public about its actions over and over again.

The mainstream media, of course, has uniformly failed to bring attention to this fact, instead packing their articles on the issue with talking points about Osama Bin Laden.

Meanwhile in Texas, lawmakers acting to outlaw TSA pat-downs entirely have said that the policy ?change? will not affect their efforts in any form.

?That?s a step in the right direction,? said Rep. David Simpson, R-Longview, adding, however, that he still plans to go forward with his bill, which is scheduled to be considered by the House on Friday. ?This legislation is going to protect people?s dignity, and it?s an effort to protect their freedom to travel.? Simpson said.

In addition, a lawmaker in yet another state, Idaho, has expressed a desire to follow the lead of Texas and introduce legislation to make intrusive TSA searches a felony.


View the original article here