Google Search

Showing posts with label Groups. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Groups. Show all posts

Thursday, June 26, 2014

IRS Now Says It Has Lost Emails From Six More Accounts Tied To The Investigation Of Its Targeting Of Tax-Exempt Groups


by Tim Cushing

The IRS recently blamed a "computer crash" for the disappearance of two years of email correspondence involving Lois Lerner, the IRS official at the center of the controversy surrounding the agency's apparent targeting of certain non-profit groups (Tea Party, Occupy, open source).

Apparently, this computer crash also destroyed any backups of the email between Lerner's office and outside government agencies, along with the hard copy backups IRS employees are required to maintain as part of its public records obligations. The latter part of that hasn't been specifically denied, but it's assumed no one's rounding up email printouts at the moment. As is the new Standard Operating Procedure for Grandstanding, a Congressman has demanded the NSA hand over the metadata on the missing Lerner emails.

Now, it appears that Lois Lerner's computer crash was only part of a much larger series of well-timed computer crashes.

The Internal Revenue Service says it can't produce e-mails from six more employees involved in the targeting of conservative groups, according to two Republicans investigating the scandal.

The IRS recently informed Ways and Means chairman Dave Camp and subcommittee chairman Charles Boustany that computer crashes resulted in additional lost e-mails, including from Nikole Flax, the chief of staff to former IRS commissioner Steven Miller, who was fired in the wake of the targeting scandal.

The question is still: conspiracy or colossal screwup?

Certainly the fact that emails and accounts directly related to the investigation are missing data from the crucial 2009-2011 period does make it look like the agency's hiding something. But the possibility that this is can be chalked up to regular government ineptitude is never too far away.

As was noted earlier (in the IRS's own documentation no less), the agency uses Microsoft Outlook and Exchange, which would suggest that further backups exist, as does (again) the IRS's own statements. John Hinderaker at Power Line quotes the IRS on its backup processes.

For disaster recovery purposes, the IRS does a daily back-up of its email servers. ? Prior to May 2013, these backups were retained on tape for six months, and then for cost efficiency, the back-up tapes were released for re-use. In May of last year, the IRS changed its policy and began storing rather than recycling its backup tapes.
This means that older backups no longer exist, at least anything "taped over" prior to the change of policy. One wonders why the agency was allowed to recycle backups when much of what's being backed up is subject to public records laws. But to make the situation even worse, the IRS greatly restricted the number of emails each employee could retain.
Currently, the average individual employee's email box limit is 500 megabytes, which translates to approximately 6,000 emails. ? Prior to July 2011, the limit was lower, 150 megabytes or roughly 1,800 emails.
As Hinderaker points out, someone in Lerner's position could run through that allotment in just a few days, meaning she would most likely begin archiving them to her own computer, something that could actually destroy emails when it crashed.

But this doesn't excuse the missing email, although it does help explain it. As the IRS's own policies note, archiving email to local storage is not an adequate solution and does not comply with public records regulations. So, Lerner and the six others affected should have had hard copy printouts of every email that could possibly be considered a relevant public record. Apparently, they don't and it's highly unlikely that many IRS officials take this Luddic requirement seriously.

Even with this additional information, the coverup theory isn't completely dispelled. One computer crash nuking vital emails is unfortunate. Six computers all taking out relevant email from a specific time period goes far past coincidental. The fact that the IRS hid this from the investigatory committee for months before finally "revealing" it on page 15 of a 27-page letter lends more credence to those who feel there's been a concerted effort to keep information buried. It also should be noted that the IRS itself has not stepped up and explained how something like this could happen (other than saying "computer crash"). Anything pertaining to the IRS's regrettable backup "solutions" and absurdly tiny email storage has been uncovered by the research of others. So, until the agency has anything further to add, the scale remains perfectly balanced between "malice" and "stupidity."


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Politics/Corruption
- If The Clintons Are Worth 50 Million, Why Do They Get Nearly A Million A Year From The Taxpayers?
- Peoria Mayor Continues To Defend Police Raid Of Twitter User's Home, Threatens To Sue For Defamation
- Chairman Of Goldman Sachs Peter Sutherland Confronted At Bilderberg!
- Bilderberger Speaks With Protesters...
- Bilderberg Talks Nukes, Euro Nationalism & Barack Obama ? Leak
- No "Need" To Know "Health Effects" Of E-Cigs, Issue Ban Regardless Says County Commissioner
- Joe Biden Builds an International Dynasty
- Obama's Billion Dollar Helicopters

'Lost' e-mails my foot - Just ask the NSA for a copy ! The FBI should polygraph lerner, and have her cuffed and stuffed and
locked up.
two words...... CLOUD COMPUTING... ForfuckSake !!!!
the arrogant IRS-hole bastards are pissin in congress members ( & by extention, citizens) faces .
She saw Clapper et al get away with lying so she's hardly gonna tell the truth. And to take the 5th , hah ! I thought the constitution isn't being adhered to anymore ? certainly seems like that for the population in general.
A government rotten with corruption from the very top all the way down to the lowest gestapo member.......
Waterboard her, it's not torture I'm told ! 'she would most likely begin archiving them to her own computer, something that could actually destroy emails when it crashed.'

Yep, if the computer 'crashed' because 'someone' held a big powerful electro-magnet over it !
Here's a video of data being recovered from hard-disk drives salvaged from the rubble of the demolished Twin Towers !! :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYxYgWsMLAg

Either way, it's a totally lame and unbelievable excuse.
These e-mails are NOT her private property, they are public records and you have to be dumber than wet paint to believe there are no backups .

Imagine the IRS raids your business and asks for the last 5 years records and you answer :
Sorry, I'm to cheap to store them for more than a fortnight .
How long will that alone get you behind bars ??

PS :
Yeah, this really pisses me off big time, because it's a thing I know A LOT about . Unlike Tim Cushing, who seems to believe that data can actually disappear from the surface of a HDD due to a 'crash' .
Baloney BULLSHIT I call ...

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

In Bid for Tanks, NH Police Label Protest Groups 'Terrorists'


Disclosure comes amidst growing call against militarization of police forces
Lauren McCauley


In a bid to bring armored vehicles to the small, capital city of Concord, New Hampshire, the local police department is trying to exploit peaceful activist groups such as Occupy New Hampshire and the libertarian Free State Project as "terror threats."

Through a right to know request, the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union (NHCLU)?as part of an ongoing project against the militarization of local law enforcement agencies?obtained a grant filed by the Concord Police Department requesting $258,000 from the Department of Homeland Security for an armored BearCat vehicle.

"The State of New Hampshire?s experience with terrorism slants primarily towards the domestic type," the grant states, adding that?with groups such as the "Free Staters" and Occupy NH active and presenting "daily challenges"?the "threat is real and here."

"It's far from clear to us why an armored vehicle would be necessary to address what are generally, by and large, non-violent movements that in fact provide little or no threat to the security of our state," said Devon Chaffee, executive director of the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union.

Calling the police grant "absolutely false and absurd," Occupy NH points out that the group?better known for litter pick-ups and "too-polite political bird dogging"?has not been functioning since July of 2012 and has not had a "notable Occupy gathering since April of 2013."

"Occupy New Hampshire has a statement of non-violence," they continue, adding that the libertarian Free State project has a "non-aggression principle."

According to Concord police chief John Duval, last fall the city council "unanimously" approved the grant application.

Described by Duval as an "armor-plated box on wheels," the Lenco BearCat G3 has been requested for use in responding to acts of terrorism involving "chemical, biological, and radiological materials as well as explosive gases" and smaller-scale crises such as "suicidal and hostage situations."

Concord hopes to join other New Hampshire towns Keene and Manchester, who already own BearCat tanks.

The controversy comes amidst a growing call against the militarization of police forces where?with federal funding?neighborhood officers are being "armed with the weapons and tactics of war."

"Equipping state and local law enforcement with military weapons and vehicles, military tactical training, and actual military assistance to conduct traditional law enforcement erodes civil liberties and encourages increasingly aggressive policing, particularly in poor neighborhoods and communities of color," said Kara Dansky, senior counsel for the ACLU's Center for Justice.

Ahead of an August 12 public hearing about the proposed purchase of the BearCat, Occupy NH will be holding a meeting on Friday to discuss the arming of their "sleepy little state" and consider pursuant actions against the agents "who are so threatened by the peaceful citizens" of New Hampshire.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Cop Convicted Of Second-Degree Manslaughter For Shooting 5-Yr-Old Boy In Back Of Head Gets Record Expunged, Now Free Again To Become An Officer
- Boston Cop Shoves Videographer, Then Threatens to Arrest Him for "Battery On A Police Officer"
- Man Refuses To ID At Texas Border Patrol Checkpoint, Checkpoint Officer Says "Get The F*ck Out of Here" & Waves Him Through
- Attorneys For Ibragim Todashev's Father Say There's NO Evidence He Was Armed When FBI Executed Him
- Philly Cop Filmed Punching Small Woman In Face At Puerto Rican Day Parade Gets Job Back With Full Back Pay
- Oregon Deputies Caught on Dash Cam Acknowledging Illegal Traffic Stop
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- "They Kidnapped Our Child": Why CPS Needs Transparency Now

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here

Saturday, September 1, 2012

FBI: Constitution Stands In Way of Government Thwarting "Extremist"* Groups



Kurt Nimmo

According to Homeland Security News Wire, the federal government considers "extremist domestic organizations" as dangerous, if not more so, than foreign terrorist organizations. The FBI and federal law enforcement are stymied in detecting these groups by the First Amendment and political opposition "suspicious of the government's motives," the website reports.

The portrayal of military veteran and suspected Sikh temple shooter Wade Michael Page as a white supremacist has given new credence to the Department of Homeland Security?s debunked report on "rightwing extremism." The 2009 report, initiated during the Bush regime, characterizes returning veterans as fodder for hate groups supposedly below the government?s radar.

"What is clear from the FBI surveillance and analysis of extremist groups in the United States, surveillance which intensified after 9/11, is that the U.S. government has considered neo-Nazi and white supremacists as genuine threats for many years," the Homeland Security News Wire reports. Declassified FBI documents released through FOIA requests show that the government considers "these groups as threats for decades -- so long in fact, that it has been lost on many that white supremacists, in the form of the Ku Klux Klan, pioneered modern homegrown terrorism."

Left unmentioned is the well documented fact the FBI has established and run many of these racist organizations. On August 6, we posted a story detailing the connections between the FBI (and the Southern Poverty Law Center) and a number of white supremacist groups. During the trial of Hal Turner, supposedly a noted racist, it was revealed he worked for the government and was regarded as a "National Security Intelligence" asset.

The FBI has controlled racist and white supremacist groups since the 1960s. Under COINTELPRO, the FBI "subsidized, armed, directed and protected the Ku Klux Klan and other right-wing groups," Brian Glick writes. Racist groups were used to create a strategy of tension by attacking groups on the so-called left, including anti-war, Chicano and Puerto Rican activists and nationalists.

Reuters quotes government officialdom as stating that federal law enforcement is unable to effectively deal with "lone wolf" shooters like Wade Michael Page because the First Amendment stands in the way. ?We can?t launch investigations based on free speech,? a federal law enforcement official told Reuters. If federal investigators did investigate an individual for merely expressing "extremist views" (anti-government views), the official said, ?they could get into trouble.?

In February, the FBI described "anti-government extremists" as groups and individuals opposed to taxes and oppressive government regulations. The FBI specifically concentrated on so-called "sovereign citizens" who are said to pose a threat to local law enforcement.

Reuters notes that European governments have criminalized political speech. In contrast to constitutional protections afforded to individuals and groups in the United States,

laws in some European nations proscribe and even criminalize various forms of ?hate speech.? German law bans ?incitement of popular hatred.?

In Britain, the former captain of England?s national soccer team was recently put on trial for allegedly hurling a racist taunt at a rival player. He was subsequently acquitted.

FBI spokesman Paul Bresson admitted that the First Amendment stands in the way of criminalizing political speech deemed extremist by the government.

?No matter how offensive to some, we are keenly aware that expressing views by itself is not a crime and the protections afforded under the Constitution cannot be compromised,? he told Reuters.


(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- Leaked: Stratfor Emails Reveal Secret, Widespread 'TrapWire' Surveillance System
- FBI Monitored Dotcom Raid Via Live Video Link, Secret Govt Group Involved
- Google Starts Punishing "Pirate" Sites In Search Results
- Court: Feds Can Spy On Americans Without Warrants With No Legal Repurcussions
- Demonoid Busted As A Gift To The United States Government
- Senate Anti-Leaks Bill Threatens the Rights of the Press and the Public
- FBI's Facial Recognition is Coming to a State Near You
- Did You Know That Professional Writing Is Dying And Only Taxing The Public To Pay Writers Can Save It

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



View the original article here