Follow @infolibnews!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src='//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,'script','twitter-wjs'); by William Grigg
"The fear is what's given us the reason to do this," insisted Todd Stovall, the head functionary of the paramilitary occupation force afflicting Paragould, Arkansas, as he announced that the city would be placed under martial law for the supposed purpose of deterring crime. "Once I have stats and people are saying they're scared, we can do this. It allows us to do what we're fixing to do."
What Stovall and his fellow tax-feeders are "fixing to do" is to leave the city's streets clotted with SWAT operators toting AR-15s and official permission to harass anybody who comes within eyeshot.
The marauders "are going to be in SWAT gear and have AR-15s around their neck," grunted Stovall at a town hall meeting held last Thursday at the West View Baptist Church. "If you're out walking, we're going to stop you, ask why you're out walking, check for your ID."
"We're going to do it to everybody," Stovall explained, anticipating objections. "Criminals don't like being talked to."
The same is true of citizens, of course -- but like most members of his paramilitary tribe, Stovall divides the world between enlightened agents of State "authority" such as himself and the Mundane population, which is to be intimidated into submission.
Stovall insists that constitutional quibbles over probable cause don't apply, because the "crisis" justifies imposition of a city-wide curfew and garrison state measures.
"I've got statistical reasons that say I've got a lot of crime right now, which gives me probable cause to ask what you're doing out." He admits that he didn't consult an attorney before reaching that conclusion, and that "I don't even know that there's ever been a difference" between what he's proposing and undisguised martial law. To those who might complain about being harassed by Stovall's minions, the chief offers an unqualified promise" "We have a zero-tolerance. We are prepared to throw your hind-end in jail, OK? We are not going to take a lot of flack."
Paragould historically has a very high burglary rate, but the violent crime rate is substantially below the national average: In 2010, the last year for which stats are available, there wasn't a single murder in the town of roughly 26,000 people. But political elites and their enforcers are adept at manufacturing fears, and the bullet-headed militarist who heads the police department -- and appears to be building his own little private army -- assumes that government derives its "just" powers from whatever fears it can instill and exploit in its subjects.
(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
Latest Tyranny/Police State
- North Carolina: Driving While Nervous is Not a Crime
- Indefinite Detention Without Trial: Completely Unconstitutional, Yet Routine
- Not So Merry Christmas Drug Busts
- Utah: Traffic Stop Valid Even When Cop Causes Violation
- Santa Claus Arrested by DPS Capitol Police for Chalking Sidewalk
- San Diego Cops Beat & Pepper Spray Innocent Man With Down Syndrome
- Arizona Police Officer Caught Hiding Evidence In His Garage, Lying About It -- Keeps Job
- Denver Police Officer Found Guilty Of Using Badge To Sexually Assaulting Woman
So according to Mr. Stovall the definition of a criminal is someone that doesn't "liked being talked to." That seems to be a rather low threshold of culpability. I suppose this is the logical conclusion when the collective deem their rights bestowed upon them by the whims of government rather than endued by Omnipotent God. I hope the good citizens of Paragould run these bush league tyrants out of town. I do believe only the President of the United States or a State governor can declare martial law - and the Governor only within his state. So, unless the Governor of my state (Arkansas) intends to declare martial law, I do believe this will constitute an attempt to perform a coup by whoever thinks they can declare it. I could be wrong, but I'm doing some research to find out. Well, I don't have any hard sources, most of what I have is from online encyclopedias and such, but it looks like city officials and police chiefs can't legally declare martial law. I could be wrong, but it does appear any attempt to force citizens into this would be illegal, if not unconstitutional. Also, 'scared people' and 'statistics' do not probable cause make. I may take a ride over there in the next week or two and walk around a bit, see what happens...
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
