An Obama-appointed judge rules its indefinite detention provisions likely violate the 1st and 5th Amendments
BY GLENN GREENWALD
A federal district judge today, the newly-appointed Katherine Forrest of the Southern District of New York, issued an amazing ruling: one which?preliminarily enjoins enforcement of the highly controversial indefinite provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act, enacted by Congress and signed into law by President Obama last December. This afternoon?s ruling came as part of a lawsuit brought by seven dissident plaintiffs ? including Chris Hedges, Dan Ellsberg, Noam Chomsky, and Brigitta Jonsdottir ? alleging that the NDAA violates??both their free speech and?associational rights guaranteed by the First Amendment as well as?due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United?States Constitution.?
The ruling was a sweeping victory for the plaintiffs, as it rejected each of the Obama DOJ?s three arguments: (1) because none of the plaintiffs has yet been indefinitely detained, they lack ?standing? to challenge the statute; (2) even if they have standing, the lack of imminent enforcement against them renders injunctive relief unnecessary; and (3)?the NDAA creates no new detention powers beyond what the 2001 AUMF already provides.
As for the DOJ?s first argument ? lack of standing ? the court found that the plaintiffs are already suffering substantial injury from the reasonable fear that they could be indefinitely detained under section 1021 of the NDAA as a result of their constitutionally protected activities.
Read More
Latest Resistance
- Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge
- IP-Address Can't Even Identify a State, BitTorrent Judge Rules
- Anarchast Ep. 25 with Josh Luther
- Drone Bombings Truther Caught on Video
- You Have Every Right to Photograph That Cop
- Pokemon Theme Song Creator Creates Parody Re-Mix For Ron Paul
- Rand Paul Launches Campaign to End the TSA
- Montreal Protesters Go Fishing For Cops w/ Donuts On Sticks [Pic]
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.
About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill
